|
|
|
Sort Order |
|
|
|
Items / Page
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Srl | Item |
| 1 |
ID:
176139
|
|
|
|
|
| Summary/Abstract |
The policy orientations reflected in the fifth amendment to China’s constitution combine some elements of Maoism (an emphasis on ideology, the party, and personality cult); some of the constitutional formality of the Republican era (1912–1949), such as Sun Yat-sen’s Wuquan Xianfa (Five Powers Constitution); and some elements of the legal tradition of China’s imperial past. These policy orientations were justified by a Maoist philosophical voluntarism: the relative detachment between the “economic base” and the “superstructure” justified the persistence of the Chinese cultural tradition and the notion that political reform does not have to accompany economic reform. On those areas that do not represent an imminent threat to the regime, such as economics and law in general, the fifth amendment is purposely vague, to give the regime flexibility in policymaking.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 2 |
ID:
109040
|
|
|
|
|
| Publication |
2011.
|
| Summary/Abstract |
In this issue of Chinese Law and Government and the next (September-October, vol. 44, no. 5) we reflect the changes that have taken place in China's legislative system in the past three decades. It is important to publish these two issues at this moment, as the Chinese government announced in 1997 that by the year 2010, China should have formed a comprehensive socialist legal system with Chinese characteristics.1 To be as truthful as possible in sketching this picture we have decided to include original documents, not analytical articles that explain the developments of China's legislative reforms.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 3 |
ID:
109387
|
|
|
|
|
| Publication |
2011.
|
| Summary/Abstract |
In this issue of Chinese Law and Government and the previous (July-August 2011, vol. 44, no. 4) we include important laws on legislation on the national level, as with the previous issue, and the local levels, as with this issue. We have also included important background information related to the explanation of these laws. It is important to publish these two issues at this moment, as the Chinese government announced in 1997 that by the year 2010, China should have formed a comprehensive socialist legal system with Chinese characteristics. To be as truthful as possible in sketching this picture, we have decided to include original documents, that is, laws and the explanation of the making of these laws by the legislators, not analytical articles.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 4 |
ID:
080569
|
|
|
|
|
| Publication |
Armonk, M E Sharpe, 2001.
|
| Description |
xv, 370p.
|
| Standard Number |
076560566X
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Copies: C:1/I:0,R:0,Q:0
Circulation
| Accession# | Call# | Current Location | Status | Policy | Location |
| 044899 | 306.20951/HUA 044899 | Main | On Shelf | General | |
|
|
|
|
| 5 |
ID:
071918
|
|
|
|
|
| Publication |
New Jersey, World Scientific Publishing Co., 2006.
|
| Description |
xii, 330p.
|
| Series |
Series on Contemporary China Vol 4
|
| Standard Number |
9812565027
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Copies: C:1/I:0,R:0,Q:0
Circulation
| Accession# | Call# | Current Location | Status | Policy | Location |
| 051262 | 306.20951/ZHO 051262 | Main | On Shelf | General | |
|
|
|
|
| 6 |
ID:
122520
|
|
|
| 7 |
ID:
135758
|
|
|
|
|
| Summary/Abstract |
Existing studies about the 1975 constitution in the English literature, mostly conducted shortly after its announcement, are primarily interested in how the document differs from the constitutions of 1954 and 1978. The current study is instead primarily interested in the dynamics and process of drafting the 1975 constitution. Although the document reflects the radicalism of the Cultural Revolution, it was also the result of political compromise. The roles of Mao and the party, the concept of “dictatorship of the proletariat,” and the belief in communist internationalism were all toned down because of the preceding events that occurred. The fate of the 1975 People’s Republic of China constitution was closely linked to Zhang Chunqiao, the key person in charge of drafting the document. Although many of Zhang’s ideas as reflected in the 1975 constitution were communistic, the way that the politics was conducted then was not. Unlike the more commonly used method of textual analysis from a comparative perspective, this study used materials that emerged after the Cultural Revolution to document the dynamics of drafting the constitution.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|