Query Result Set
Skip Navigation Links
   ActiveUsers:728Hits:19059907Skip Navigation Links
Show My Basket
Contact Us
IDSA Web Site
Ask Us
Today's News
HelpExpand Help
Advanced search

  Hide Options
Sort Order Items / Page
INSTITUTION BUILDING (4) answer(s).
 
SrlItem
1
ID:   140334


Aid, accountability and institution building in Ethiopia: the self-limiting nature of technocratic aid / Abegaz, Berhanu   Article
Abegaz, Berhanu Article
0 Rating(s) & 0 Review(s)
Summary/Abstract Forty billion dollars of ODA over the past two decades has reduced destitution in post-socialist and post-conflict Ethiopia. It has also boosted the technocratic capacity of exclusionary state institutions, while doubly enfeebling the fledgling private sector and independent political and civic organisations. This aid–institution paradox is a product of an alignment of donor–recipient strategic interests. The five major donors pursued geopolitical and poverty reduction objectives; and the narrowly based ruling elite sought total capture of the state, ownership of the development agenda and use of pro-poor growth to leverage large aid inflows and to seek domestic political legitimacy. By coupling poverty reduction with adequate space for inclusive market, civic and political engagement, a farsighted coalition of donors could have complemented capacity building with the promotion of state resilience. Scaled-up aid can still be delivered, as in Eastern Europe, conditional on meaningful mutual accountability and the rule of law.
Key Words Ethiopia  Aid  Accountability  Institution Building  State Resilience 
        Export Export
2
ID:   072622


China's fate as a multinational state: a preliminary assessment / Zhu, Yuchao; Blachford, Dongyan   Journal Article
Zhu, Yuchao Journal Article
0 Rating(s) & 0 Review(s)
Publication 2006.
Summary/Abstract After the collapse of the two communist multinational states, the Soviet Union and Yugoslavia, the fact that China survives as the only communist multinational state poses an interesting question: why does China remain intact and how long will it be able to survive in its present state? This paper tries to address these questions. The analysis is centred on three areas: the formation and characteristics of China's ethnic minorities and their role in this multinational state; the relevant domestic politics including institution building and polices; and the influence of external conditions such as international law and realpolitik. The preliminary finding is that in fact only two minority groups in two regions, Tibetans in Tibet and Uygurs in Xinjiang, have the real potential of secession, but it is very unlikely that China as a multinational state will disintegrate in the near future because the internal environment and international politics do not constitute adequate conditions for that to happen.
        Export Export
3
ID:   085672


NATO enlargement and institution building: military personnel policy challenges in the post - Soviet context / George, Julie A; Teigen, Jeremy M   Journal Article
George, Julie A Journal Article
0 Rating(s) & 0 Review(s)
Publication 2008.
Summary/Abstract States' conscription policies reveal much about their security climate, economic constraints, political debates, and social norms. While conscription has waned among democratic countries, several states maintain it as a way to socialize and educate their citizens. As post-communist states embrace Western influence and NATO, many have ended compulsory military service. In post-Soviet Georgia, however, conscription policy is a microcosm illustrating the difficulties of bridging security vulnerabilities, political upheaval, and resource realities. Although previous scholarship predicts that security and economic needs should supersede other considerations, we find that the domestic political context looms larger for decision makers of transitioning states
        Export Export
4
ID:   187975


Power of Building Parallel Institutions: How China’s New Strategy Advances Global Governance Reform / Xu, Yue ; Liu, Hongsong   Journal Article
Liu, Hongsong Journal Article
0 Rating(s) & 0 Review(s)
Summary/Abstract China has been a proponent of global governance reform, but its reform strategy does not remain constant. In the wake of the Global Financial Crisis, its political opportunities were depleting when dominant states, especially the United States, were recovering from the crisis. As a result, the promised 2010 International Monetary Fund (IMF) reform package failed to materialize under Beijing’s old reform strategy of making overt proposals. We argue that Beijing’s goal of the IMF reform was achieved through the creation of the Asian Infrastructure Investment Bank. To advance reform, the newly-created institution needs to have sufficient governance capacity to ensure its effectiveness, produce policy outcomes close to Beijing’s preferences, and operate in an issue area competing for resources with the established institution, the IMF, but not necessarily in the same issue area as is required by the literature of contested multilateralism.
        Export Export