Srl | Item |
1 |
ID:
134622
|
|
|
Summary/Abstract |
Initially, recognition of the vital role played by regional diplomacy did not accompany NATO’s substantial commitment to economic and political development in Afghanistan from 2001 to 2014. Pakistan in particular had a major influence on the conduct of reconstruction efforts and NATO’s efforts to lay the institutional foundations in Afghanistan. Canada, an early and committed participant in the International Security Assistance Force, would by 2005 come to recognise the vital importance of the role of Pakistan in the outcome of the mission. However, regional limits to the influence of the United States, the North Atlantic Treaty Organisation, and Canada made comprehensive efforts unattainable.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
ID:
108179
|
|
|
3 |
ID:
072682
|
|
|
4 |
ID:
079501
|
|
|
Publication |
Hampshire, Palgrave Macmillan, 2007.
|
Description |
x, 236p.
|
Standard Number |
9781403979292
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Copies: C:1/I:0,R:0,Q:0
Circulation
Accession# | Call# | Current Location | Status | Policy | Location |
052915 | 322.5/SCH 052915 | Main | On Shelf | General | |
|
|
|
|
5 |
ID:
080786
|
|
|
Publication |
2008.
|
Summary/Abstract |
The classical repertoire of insurgency types is under-specified, and does not apply well to the case of Pakistan's conduct of insurgency in Kashmir. Pakistan's approach to insurgency has been a consistent tribal variant of focoism, in which there is a reliance on imported itinerant insurgents to conduct raids to stimulate an uprising. This has its basis in the traditional warfare of the region, learned US insurgency doctrine in the 1960s, and an historical disregard for subject populations, which has led to an aversion to fostering grass-roots political movements
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|