| Srl | Item |
| 1 |
ID:
015416
|
|
|
|
|
| Publication |
Nov-Dec 1992.
|
| Description |
25-46
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 2 |
ID:
102301
|
|
|
| 3 |
ID:
075870
|
|
|
| 4 |
ID:
181229
|
|
|
|
|
| Summary/Abstract |
This article investigates the context and development of the Israel Defence Industries (IDI) during the period 1930–2018. During this timeframe, the IDI was forced to transform several times with the Israel Ministry of Defence acting as the main facilitator. Well established links among government institutions, academia, investors and the IDI contribute to armament quality and innovations which supports market expansion. Nevertheless, US support remains an important enabler in facilitating the IDI developments. Nowadays, the IDI is an important player in Israeli economics that contributes to the exports and facilitates developments in other sectors.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 5 |
ID:
171645
|
|
|
|
|
| Summary/Abstract |
The European arms industry is challenged by several adverse “headwinds.” Fragmentation leads to costly duplications and, in conjunction with stagnating budgets and sharply increasing costs, prevents firms from exploiting economies of scale and learning. This is exacerbated by size differentials vis-a-vis the leading US arms manufacturers and competition from emerging producers. As some “headwinds” are self-enforcing, far-reaching industrial and policy responses are required to improve the industry's outlook. As exports may not indefinitely compensate for low domestic demand, there is an economic imperative for further cross-border collaboration and consolidation. Despite various EU policy initiatives, progresses regarding the European Defence Equipment Market and strengthening the European Defence Technological Industrial Base have been relatively slow. It remains to be seen whether the European Defence Fund will be the proclaimed “game-changer,” raising competitiveness of the European arms industry. At the same time, the UK's withdrawal from the EU adds uncertainties.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 6 |
ID:
087237
|
|
|
|
|
| Publication |
2009.
|
| Summary/Abstract |
In response to the request for Information on strategic airlift fron the Indian Ministry of Defence received in 2008, Boing IDS responded with an offer of the C 17, Globemaster III. This most advanced military airlift aircraft in the world can undertake diverse mission demands around the globe.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 7 |
ID:
109920
|
|
|
| 8 |
ID:
034635
|
|
|
|
|
| Publication |
London, MIT Press, 1989.
|
| Description |
417p.
|
| Standard Number |
0262071177
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Copies: C:1/I:0,R:0,Q:0
Circulation
| Accession# | Call# | Current Location | Status | Policy | Location |
| 031019 | 355.33573/GAN 031019 | Main | On Shelf | General | |
|
|
|
|
| 9 |
ID:
122631
|
|
|
| 10 |
ID:
123792
|
|
|
|
|
| Publication |
2013.
|
| Summary/Abstract |
The range of potentially looming or very real threats is broad, as are the assets already used today, be it, Iran's underground nuclear enrichment sites or Islamist irregulars in Toyotas. This survey is a stroll through recent selected developments in modern air to ground weapons (ATGW) countering these threats.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 11 |
ID:
131752
|
|
|
|
|
| Publication |
2014.
|
| Summary/Abstract |
Airbus defence and space launched its Zephyr 8 unmanned aircraft system (UASs) programme in late April, describing the systems as a high altitude pseudo satellite (HAPS).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 12 |
ID:
083766
|
|
|
| 13 |
ID:
171016
|
|
|
|
|
| Summary/Abstract |
This article analyses the defence industrial market using an agent-based model. The model draws a simplified version of the sector regarding the market agents and their conduct based on empirical data and commonly observed micro-regularities. Its computer implementation is initially tested on a simple scenario to verify its realism. Afterwards, some specific scenarios, caused by government industrial policies, are assessed. The main finding is the capability of the model to reproduce the behaviour of market agents and to replicate the evolution of the macroeconomic indicators and patterns normally seen under different, but common conditions and policies (e.g. free market, discriminatory procurement, licensed production or multilateral development and production). This suggests a powerful tool for gaining further insight and exploring government policies in this important economic sector.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 14 |
ID:
127727
|
|
|
|
|
| Publication |
2014.
|
| Summary/Abstract |
In the past three years, NATO countries have cut $120 billion from their combined defence budgets, and they are set to fall further in the next decade. In the US, the Budget Control Act will, by 2021, cut US government spending by $1 trillion much of which will come from defence cuts. US Defence Secretary, Chuck Hagel, said in 2013 that one of the least drastic ways of reaching cuts needed by the sequester would see up to 70,000 less active personnel in the US Army and up to 65,000 less in army reserves. The US Air Force could lose some 25,000 personnel because of sequester, along with 550 aircraft, according to USAF Secretary Eric Fanning.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 15 |
ID:
062717
|
|
|
| 16 |
ID:
014291
|
|
|
|
|
| Publication |
Oct 1992.
|
| Description |
474-478
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 17 |
ID:
177991
|
|
|
|
|
| Summary/Abstract |
State investments in domestic defence industries are one of the most puzzling trends in international relations. Economists contend that these investments waste resources, while political scientists claim that armaments’ resultant overproduction fuels arms races. Why then do governments cultivate defence industries? I draw on cases from Israel, South Africa and Iraq to argue that the answers to these questions are distinct. Fears about supply security frequently spur states to begin developing arms industries, and elites’ techno-nationalist beliefs often sustain their defence-industrial investments. Defence industries’ primary national security value, however, lies in their hitherto unappreciated contribution to states’ military adaptation capacity.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 18 |
ID:
100462
|
|
|
| 19 |
ID:
062965
|
|
|
| 20 |
ID:
052885
|
|
|