Query Result Set
Skip Navigation Links
   ActiveUsers:420Hits:19923513Skip Navigation Links
Show My Basket
Contact Us
IDSA Web Site
Ask Us
Today's News
HelpExpand Help
Advanced search

  Hide Options
Sort Order Items / Page
MOWLE, THOMAS S (2) answer(s).
 
SrlItem
1
ID:   080323


Global NATO: bandwagoning in a unipolar world / Mowle, Thomas S; Sacko, David H   Journal Article
Mowle, Thomas S Journal Article
0 Rating(s) & 0 Review(s)
Publication 2007.
Summary/Abstract NATO must adapt to the structural imperatives of a unipolar world, or become increasingly irrelevant. The Global NATO initiative of 2006 would have begun transformation of NATO into a more flexible, effective, and legitimate organization. The benefits of NATO globalization are greatest for the United States. Unipolarity means Downloaded By: [Inst for Defence Studies & Analysis] At: 07:12 18 February 2008 that the United States does not need allies to ensure its security, but the United States nevertheless receives value from the existence of a pool of capable states whose equipment and training allow them to operate together. Unipolarity means that other states will be more likely to bandwagon with the United States than to balance against it; laundering that cooperation through an institution can enhance those other states' influence. A NATO expanded to include states that share common interests with the United States, acting in more flexible coalitions rather than always as a whole, would meet these goals. It would also be more effective and legitimate as an organization, since it would include greater military resources from a more diverse collection of countries
Key Words NATO Alliance  Unipolar World 
        Export Export
2
ID:   072903


Iraq's militia problem / Mowle, Thomas S   Journal Article
Mowle, Thomas S Journal Article
0 Rating(s) & 0 Review(s)
Publication 2006.
Summary/Abstract Militias in Iraq were not effectively demobilised or disarmed because the American occupation forces did not apply lessons from previous experience. The United States did not develop a comprehensive plan for addressing all armed groups, but tried to disarm groups before a full political settlement was reached and accepted, and did not include a neutral arbiter such as the United Nations. Militia disarmament thus failed in Iraq. The failure to apply lessons from the past was compounded by the fact that demobilisation was attempted in a situation where no group fully accepted either the occupation government or the nascent Iraqi state. This failure allowed Iraqi security institutions to be infected by paramilitary groups, heightening the extent of civil conflict.
Key Words Iraq  Civil Conflict  Militia Disarmament  Demobilisation 
        Export Export