|
|
|
Sort Order |
|
|
|
Items / Page
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Srl | Item |
| 1 |
ID:
106789
|
|
|
| 2 |
ID:
092061
|
|
|
|
|
| Publication |
Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2001.
|
| Description |
xiii, 890p.
|
| Standard Number |
9780199247622
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Copies: C:1/I:0,R:0,Q:0
Circulation
| Accession# | Call# | Current Location | Status | Policy | Location |
| 054570 | 355.02/GAT 054570 | Main | On Shelf | General | |
|
|
|
|
| 3 |
ID:
072993
|
|
|
|
|
| Publication |
2006.
|
| Summary/Abstract |
Nearly for 15 years as the Chairman of China's Central Military Commission, Jiang Zemin, albeit lack of real military experience, has gradually developed his military theories and principles in the process of consolidating military authority. Unquestionably, Jiang is not only the core of the third generation leadership in China, but also the most powerful man in China's military until now. That makes researchers interested in exploring military thought of this man controlling the largest armies in the world. In this paper, Jiang's basic military framework, 'Five Sentences', including 'Politically Qualified', 'Militarily Tough', 'Attitudinally Excellent', 'Strictly Disciplined' and 'Materially Guaranteed' will be separately discussed. With interpretations of 'Five Sentences', the author will thereafter provide personal comments and analysis
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 4 |
ID:
161902
|
|
|
|
|
| Summary/Abstract |
On June 1, 1918, the journal marked the 100th anniversary of the pilot issue of the military theory journal Military Thought published by the Defense Ministry of the Russian Federation, one of this country's oldest periodicals of the Armed Forces. A kind of Military Thought prototype in the prerevolutionary period of Russian history was the journal Military Collection founded in 1858 on the initiative of Prof. D.A. Milyutin at the Imperial Military Academy of the General Staff. That periodical covered issues of military policy, military art, and other military matters. The journal was extremely popular and helped promote military expertise in the Russian army. The readers will be interested to learn that the first editor of Military Collection was the prominent publicist Nikolai Chernyshevsky. Admittedly, the literary section did not survive beyond 1870, and its first editor had by then been exiled to a hard labor camp in Siberia as a political hazard to the monarchy.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 5 |
ID:
140544
|
|
|
|
|
| Publication |
New Delhi, South Asian Publishers, 1996.
|
| Description |
xii, 184p.hbk
|
| Standard Number |
8170031982
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Copies: C:1/I:0,R:0,Q:0
Circulation
| Accession# | Call# | Current Location | Status | Policy | Location |
| 038653 | 923.251/PHU 038653 | Main | On Shelf | General | |
|
|
|
|
| 6 |
ID:
090486
|
|
|
| 7 |
ID:
188332
|
|
|
|
|
| Summary/Abstract |
The article analyses the gaps and ties betweenthe doctrine and theory, in contrast with the practice, of countering subversive movements in the British Empire during the Interbellum. Contradictions between security services led to the articulation and promotion of different models of counterinsurgency. The research contains an analysis of the guerrilla warfare concept’ evolution within the military thought, through the second Boer war, Irish warof Independence and the second Arab rising in Palestine, reflecting different thoughts on interrelated problems of the ‘revolutionary movements’ and ‘sub-war’ after the Great War. Particular attentionis paid to military and political incentives and constrains of the counterinsurgency doctrine, reflecting the bureaucratic logic that stood behind the implementation of the guerrilla warfare concept at the levels of doctrine and theory in the context of the systemic crisis of empire and the growth of external pressure over the questions of the imperial defense and self-determination. Conflicting coexistence of internal security models tested within the British Empire during the Interbellum is observed in the conclusion,as well as perspectives of transfers of colonial (dis)order in front of the ‘sub-war’, as it was understood among the military circles through the prism of the guerrilla warfare concept.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 8 |
ID:
090487
|
|
|
| 9 |
ID:
163629
|
|
|
| 10 |
ID:
098452
|
|
|
|
|
| Publication |
2010.
|
| Summary/Abstract |
This study argues that, in parallel to the developments in the West over the last three decades, several nations and organizations on 'the other side of the hill' have also undertaken a significant development in their military thought. This conceptual development is referred to in the study as the 'Other RMA' ('O-RMA'). This study aims to identify and describe O-RMA, to analyze the learning process that led to it and to trace its intellectual origins. This 'way of war', whose roots lie in a series of dramatic and tumultuous events that took place in the Middle East between the years 1979 and 1982, is based on the following components: Improving absorption capability, in order to increase survivability and provide a breathing space for the 'weaker side', creating effective deterrence, in order to deter the 'stronger side' from attacking the 'weaker side' and shifting the war to more convenient areas in case this deterrent fails; and winning the war by not losing it, while creating an attrition effect. O-RMA is an exceptionally eclectic conception and its development was not intentional or systematic. This study claims that the main ideas that underlie this conceptual development evolved within the different elements, while maintaining a common image, concerning the military, technological, economic, social and political developments in the West during the 1990s.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|