| Srl | Item |
| 1 |
ID:
085417
|
|
|
|
|
| Publication |
2008.
|
| Summary/Abstract |
John H. Herz was unusual amongst the founding fathers of international relations in having paid detailed attention to the ideology and international law of the Third Reich in a study published in 1938. This article sets his investigation in the context of the turn away from law in the emerging discipline of international relations and the competing visions of Hans Kelsen and Carl Schmitt. It assesses developments in the international law of the Third Reich during the war years against Herz's own expectation of the emergence of a coherent doctrine, and concludes by suggesting that Herz's defence of international law has much to recommend it.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 2 |
ID:
073162
|
|
|
|
|
| Publication |
Edinburgh, Edinburgh University Press, 2006.
|
| Description |
vii, 245p.
|
| Standard Number |
074862290X
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Copies: C:1/I:0,R:0,Q:0
Circulation
| Accession# | Call# | Current Location | Status | Policy | Location |
| 051517 | 320.09430904/STI 051517 | Main | On Shelf | General | |
|
|
|
|
| 3 |
ID:
077629
|
|
|
|
|
| Publication |
Edinburgh, Edinburgh University Press, 2006.
|
| Description |
vii, 245p.
|
| Standard Number |
9780748622917
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Copies: C:1/I:0,R:0,Q:0
Circulation
| Accession# | Call# | Current Location | Status | Policy | Location |
| 052392 | 320.09430904/STI 052392 | Main | On Shelf | General | |
|
|
|
|
| 4 |
ID:
113302
|
|
|
|
|
| Publication |
2012.
|
| Summary/Abstract |
Although the Westphalian model takes many forms the association of Westphalian and sovereign equality is a prominent one. This article argues firstly that sovereign equality was not present as a normative principle at Westphalia. It argues further that while arguments for sovereign equality were present in the eighteenth century they did not rely on, or even suggest, a Westphalian provenance. It was, for good reasons, not until the late nineteenth century that the linkages of Westphalia and sovereign equality became commonplace, and even then sovereign equality and its linkage with Westphalia were disputed. It was not until after the Second World War, notably through the influential work of Leo Gross that the linkage of Westphalia and sovereign equality became not only widely accepted, but almost undisputed until quite recently. The article concludes by suggesting that not only did Gross bequeath a dubious historiography but that this historiography is an impediment to contemporary International Relations.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|