Query Result Set
Skip Navigation Links
   ActiveUsers:1365Hits:19838622Skip Navigation Links
Show My Basket
Contact Us
IDSA Web Site
Ask Us
Today's News
HelpExpand Help
Advanced search

  Hide Options
Sort Order Items / Page
ANTI-DUMPING DUTIES (2) answer(s).
 
SrlItem
1
ID:   180248


Analysis of Impact of Anti-dumping Duties on India–China Trade / Mahajan, Ashwani   Journal Article
Mahajan, Ashwani Journal Article
0 Rating(s) & 0 Review(s)
Summary/Abstract India has imposed anti-dumping duties (ADDs) on a total of 155 commodities against China across many sectors to protect the domestic industry since 2001. The dumping of Chinese goods into Indian markets has led to the downfall and closure of many domestic industries. Under such circumstances, ADDs had been necessitated for protecting the domestic industry. As per the World Trade Organization (WTO) rules, imposition of ADDs on imports is permitted, provided that the affected country establishes that the domestic industry has suffered material injury by such imports. An elaborate discussion explaining the investigation pertaining to ADD and imposition of ADD in relation with WTO rules is presented in the present article. During the period between 2014 and 2018, ADD has been imposed on a total of 121 commodities. The study finds that ADDs have been partially effective in reducing the imports of the commodities.
Key Words WTO  Trade Deficit  Anti-Dumping Duties 
        Export Export
2
ID:   073351


United States' discriminatory protectionism against China / Noh, Yooyeon; Mah, Jai S   Journal Article
Mah, Jai S Journal Article
0 Rating(s) & 0 Review(s)
Publication 2006.
Summary/Abstract The article examines the characteristics of the United States' (US) discriminatory protection measures, especially the antidumping (AD) duties, against China. China has been the most significant target of US trade protectionism in terms of the absolute number as well as the intensity of measures. There exists a positive relationship between the US bilateral trade deficit and the increase in the number of its discriminatory trade protection measures against China. US AD decisions against China have been led by the chemical industry, followed by the iron and steel industry. It is expected that the number of US discriminatory trade protection measures against the Chinese textile products will increase in the coming years, since the ten-year phase-out of the Multi-Fibre Arrangement (MFA) was completed at the end of 2004. Since discriminatory trade restrictions are costly in terms of the welfare of the concerned countries, it would be necessary for them to apply stricter regulations regarding the discriminatory protection measures.
        Export Export