Query Result Set
Skip Navigation Links
   ActiveUsers:779Hits:18713057Skip Navigation Links
Show My Basket
Contact Us
IDSA Web Site
Ask Us
Today's News
HelpExpand Help
Advanced search

  Hide Options
Sort Order Items / Page
OVERSEAS DEVELOPMENT (2) answer(s).
 
SrlItem
1
ID:   130614


Gathering scholars to defend the country: the institute of international relations before 1975 / Liu, Philip Hsiaopong   Journal Article
Liu, Philip Hsiaopong Journal Article
0 Rating(s) & 0 Review(s)
Publication 2014.
Summary/Abstract Throughout much of history the Institute a/'/international Relations /[IR] has been perceived as a Kuomintang think tank. Based an the perspective generated by personal contributions (before its formal establishment in 1975as part of National Chengchi University, the author tracer the IIR's foundations and key staff as far back as 1937 to argue that is was constructed during a national crisis because the state leader needed professional opinions that could be used strategically. Thus rather than considering the IIR as an organization subject to a political party. it should be regarded as on institution charged with gathering scholars to defend the country.
        Export Export
2
ID:   073381


Yellow man's burden: Chinese migrants on a civilizing mission / Nyiri, Pal   Journal Article
Nyiri, Pal Journal Article
0 Rating(s) & 0 Review(s)
Publication 2006.
Summary/Abstract Focusing on the development emphasis in discussions of Chinese migration abroad, this article interrogates the connection between the Chinese discourse of overseas development and the domestic stress on "constructing civilization" and improving the "quality" of the population. Like some Western states earlier in history, China is becoming a source of foreign investment and a participant in international development discourse (though not in its current institutions) while intensely engaged in a modernizing process at home that it feels is still far from completion. Chinese migrants abroad are central to both the process and the discourse. How, then, does the new role in overseas development fit into Chinese discourses of domestic modernization? More particularly, how do encounters with overseas subjects of development affect the position of development's putative Chinese harbingers? I argue that the view of China as having taken over the torch of the global modernizing mission unites otherwise disparate groups (government officials, migrant entrepreneurs and Christians) and is central to understanding the Chinese view of the country's position in the world.
        Export Export