Query Result Set
Skip Navigation Links
   ActiveUsers:830Hits:18935241Skip Navigation Links
Show My Basket
Contact Us
IDSA Web Site
Ask Us
Today's News
HelpExpand Help
Advanced search

  Hide Options
Sort Order Items / Page
YANOW, DVORA (3) answer(s).
 
SrlItem
1
ID:   146824


Encountering your IRB 2.0: what political scientists need to know / Yanow, Dvora; Schwartz-Shea, Peregrine   Journal Article
Yanow, Dvora Journal Article
0 Rating(s) & 0 Review(s)
Summary/Abstract This essay corrects and updates one that was originally published in Qualitative & Multi-Method Research and, in a condensed version, in three other APSA Organized Section newsletters. Our research into IRB policy has shown that many political scientists are not familiar with some of its key provisions. The intent of the essay is to increase awareness of the existing policy’s impact on political scientific research and, in particular, on graduate students and junior faculty. We remain concerned that at present, faculty are leaving discussions of research ethics to IRBs (and their counterparts worldwide), whereas these Boards largely focus on complying with the regulatory details of governmental policy. Even though this essay seeks to clarify the latter, we remain convinced that research ethics ought to be vigorously taken up within disciplinary and departmental conversations.
Key Words Political Scientists  IRB 2. 
        Export Export
2
ID:   074868


Interpretation and method: empirical research methods and the interpretive turn / Yanow, Dvora (ed); Schwartz-Shea, Peregrine (ed) 2006  Book
Yanow, Dvora Book
0 Rating(s) & 0 Review(s)
Publication Armonk, M E Sharpe, 2006.
Description xxvii, 440p.
Standard Number 0765614626
        Export Export
Copies: C:1/I:0,R:0,Q:0
Circulation
Accession#Call#Current LocationStatusPolicyLocation
051892320.072/YAN 051892MainOn ShelfGeneral 
3
ID:   100824


Perestroika ten years after: reflections on methodological diversity / Yanow, Dvora; Schwartz-Shea, Peregrine   Journal Article
Yanow, Dvora Journal Article
0 Rating(s) & 0 Review(s)
Publication 2010.
Summary/Abstract One of the primary concerns driving Perestroika was the hegemony of quantitative methods in American political science research, curricula, journals, and positions, to the exclusion of qualitative and interpretive approaches. In this article, we assess the contemporary methodological diversity of U.S. political science, at the APSA in particular, to see what, if anything, has changed over the last 10 years. This is an admittedly rough assessment, as the deadline for this symposium did not allow time to repeat the research projects that started Perestroika's and our own solo and joint efforts, the latter preceding and then intersecting with the former. We therefore give a broad overview of methods-directed activities, although we cannot help but see events through the lens of our own involvement in them, and that view is perforce partial.
Key Words Perestroika  APSA  Methodological Diversity 
        Export Export