Srl | Item |
1 |
ID:
075045
|
|
|
Publication |
2006.
|
Summary/Abstract |
This article explores two ways of conceptualizing ties between charity, contentious politics, political violence, and terrorism. The first half of the article discusses how social and political exclusion serve as motivations for within-group philanthropy, political activism, and political violence. Using this conceptualization, charity and terrorism can be seen as two activities among a range of possible actions that address grievance and exclusion. The second half of the article discusses how terrorist organizations and political insurgents use charity as a tool to move community members along a "continuum of community support" toward greater acceptance of and participation in violent activities.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
ID:
089138
|
|
|
Publication |
2009.
|
Summary/Abstract |
A Beirut taxi drivers hears news that the Hezbollah-operated television station where his son and daughter-in-law work has just been bombed by Iraeli warplanes.Beirut's southern suburb is being pum-meled in response to the abduction of two Israeli soldiers by Hezbollah militants in July 2006.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3 |
ID:
082509
|
|
|
Publication |
2008.
|
Summary/Abstract |
Based on field research in Lebanon and Sri Lanka, this article discusses the ways in which Hizballah and the LTTE use nonprofit service provision as a tool for increasing community support. The article compares the organizations' goals for service provision and specific structures of service provision. The difference in resources and capacity between the two organizations has shaped the structure of service provision used by each organization. Whereas Hizballah autonomously operates a sophisticated group of nongovernmental organization (NGO) service providers, the LTTE has developed an elaborate system for controlling and channeling the resources of existing local and international NGO service providers
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4 |
ID:
112617
|
|
|
Publication |
2012.
|
Summary/Abstract |
Drawing from interviews, surveys, and other forms of research conducted in Lebanon, Gaza and the West Bank, and Mexico, this article compares Mexican cartels to Hamas and Hezbollah. The similarities between them are striking: these are all by necessity territorially specific organizations tied to relatively defined geographic locations, and have deep and sophisticated relationships with the states within which they operate. However, there are critical differences between Mexican drug cartels and Hamas and Hezbollah as well, the most important (according to an analysis of multiple definitions of terrorism) being the presence of political and ideological motivations. This analysis illustrates the conceptual challenges and classificational ambiguity involved in analyzing terrorism and organized crime.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|