Query Result Set
Skip Navigation Links
   ActiveUsers:433Hits:20456407Skip Navigation Links
Show My Basket
Contact Us
IDSA Web Site
Ask Us
Today's News
HelpExpand Help
Advanced search

  Hide Options
Sort Order Items / Page
SIMMONS, JOEL W (2) answer(s).
 
SrlItem
1
ID:   091034


Openness, uncertainty, and social spending: implications for the globalization- welfare state debate / Nooruddin, Irfan; Simmons, Joel W   Journal Article
Nooruddin, Irfan Journal Article
0 Rating(s) & 0 Review(s)
Publication 2009.
Summary/Abstract We extend the literature on openness and spending in developing countries arguing that the effect of increasing openness depends on both regime type and the level of openness. Democracies respond to increases in openness by increasing spending while dictatorships respond by decreasing spending. However, the degree to which countries pursue the strategy of choice depends on the level of openness. In autarkic countries, an increase in import competition has more severe consequences for perceptions of job insecurity and dislocation. In response, government management of openness will be more vigorous under these conditions regardless of whether the leader increases or decreases spending. Economic selection mechanisms at work will produce an outcome wherein, at higher levels of openness, further import liberalization has smaller effects on perceptions of job insecurity and dislocation. Hence, both the demand and the supply of government management of openness will be lower.
Key Words Globalization  Welfare  Social Spending  Debate 
        Export Export
2
ID:   075226


Politics of hard choices: IMF programs and government spending / Nooruddin, Irfan; Simmons, Joel W   Journal Article
Nooruddin, Irfan Journal Article
0 Rating(s) & 0 Review(s)
Publication 2006.
Summary/Abstract A central component of International Monetary Fund (IMF) programs is reducing government budget deficits. We ask how domestic political considerations shape the distribution of cuts made by governments in IMF programs. Our central finding is that IMF programs shrink the role played by domestic politics. While democracies allocate larger shares of their budgets to public services in the absence of IMF programs, the difference between democracies and nondemocracies disappears under IMF programs. This result has important implications for our understanding of government spending priorities under different resource constraints.
        Export Export