Srl | Item |
1 |
ID:
139319
|
|
|
2 |
ID:
170797
|
|
|
3 |
ID:
093970
|
|
|
4 |
ID:
131314
|
|
|
Publication |
Australia, Australian Strategic Policy Institute, 2014.
|
Description |
71p.Pbk
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Copies: C:1/I:0,R:0,Q:0
Circulation
Accession# | Call# | Current Location | Status | Policy | Location |
057770 | 005.8095/AUS 057770 | Main | On Shelf | General | |
|
|
|
|
5 |
ID:
132478
|
|
|
Publication |
2014.
|
Summary/Abstract |
Nothing remains, neither the state nor wealth nor valour without the security provided by the armed forces. -- S H Ukraniti
Cyber space and the possibility of Cyber war, as it emerged in the late 1980s got mixed up with Information War (IW)/ Electronic War (EW). This led to numerous definitions of lW/EW/cyber war, and most definitions, instead of clarifying the issue, only created further confusion. For the purpose of this paper, the latest definition of cyber space, promulgated in the USA in 2010 being the most comprehensive, has been adopted. It defines cyber space as, "A global domain within the information environment consisting of the inter-dependent network of information technology infrastructure and resident data, including the Internet, tele-communication networks, computer systems and embedded processors and controllers." This indicates that there is a physical domain of hardware, and an information domain of software. How we deal with the information or data resident in this domain to deceive the enemy/cyber criminal becomes part of the third domain-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6 |
ID:
094636
|
|
|
7 |
ID:
142187
|
|
|
Publication |
New Delhi, Vij Books India Pvt Ltd, 2015.
|
Description |
xv, 245p.hbk
|
Standard Number |
9789384464820
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Copies: C:2/I:0,R:0,Q:0
Circulation
Accession# | Call# | Current Location | Status | Policy | Location |
058402 | 355.343/REL 058402 | Main | On Shelf | General | |
058798 | 355.343/REL 058798 | Main | On Shelf | General | |
|
|
|
|
8 |
ID:
094046
|
|
|
9 |
ID:
127085
|
|
|
10 |
ID:
093872
|
|
|
Publication |
2010.
|
Summary/Abstract |
The last couple of decades have seen a colossal change in terms of the influence that computers can have on the battlefield, with defence pundits claiming it to be the dawn of a new era in warfare. Under these circumstances, there has been a gradual paradigm shift in military thinking and strategies from the strategic aspect to the tactical aspect of cyber warfare, laying more emphasis on it being a potent force multiplier. The author believes this is wrong and rather than cyber warfare being an enhancement of traditional operations, the latter will be force multipliers of cyber warfare. This article tries to shatter myths woven around cyber warfare so as to illuminate the strategic aspects of this relatively misinterpreted notion, thus identifying a paradigm shift, making cyber war the primary means of achieving grand strategic objectives in the contemporary world order.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11 |
ID:
122032
|
|
|
12 |
ID:
075275
|
|
|
13 |
ID:
169087
|
|
|
Publication |
Dhaka, IPAG, 2020.
|
Description |
vi, 260p.hbk
|
Standard Number |
9789843467768
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Copies: C:1/I:0,R:0,Q:0
Circulation
Accession# | Call# | Current Location | Status | Policy | Location |
059762 | 303.4833/KHA 059762 | Main | On Shelf | General | |
|
|
|
|
14 |
ID:
105610
|
|
|
15 |
ID:
103030
|
|
|
16 |
ID:
101363
|
|
|
Publication |
2010.
|
Summary/Abstract |
China's emergence as an economic and military power has given rise to apprehensions globally, related not only to China's cultural and historical 'alienness', but also to its apparent willingness to challenge the global system and architecture of global governance. While non-Western countries are wary of the possible impact on them and on the global order of Chinese actions, they appear to be willing to cooperate with China on some global issues in order to change a system often seen as inequitable and unbalanced. Yet, the West seems to conflate the idea of a rising China with that of other emerging markets. Given their historical, political and cultural experiences, however, their access to power and influence, if and when it happens, need not necessarily take the same route as China. This is true particularly of India; India is likely, at least for the foreseeable future, to remain within the existing paradigm of global governance, though it may seek to adapt the rules and structures to better reflect its economic, political and security interests. This would not preclude cooperation on a selective basis on specific global issues with different partners, particularly in the realm of global challenges such as climate change, non-proliferation, international trade and finance and the global commons, such as space, the oceans and cyberspace.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17 |
ID:
130365
|
|
|
18 |
ID:
170890
|
|
|
19 |
ID:
138032
|
|
|
20 |
ID:
125305
|
|
|
Publication |
2013.
|
Summary/Abstract |
With the fast changing of world scenario and the politics evolving around it, especially where India is more concern, is a great challenge for the Indian foreign policy. It is hard to predict what the 21st century will turn out to be, but we live in a time when our inter-dependent and networked lives co-exist. China has gradually surrounded India and is influencing all the Indian neighboring countries.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|