| Srl | Item |
| 1 |
ID:
101894
|
|
|
| 2 |
ID:
096084
|
|
|
|
|
| Publication |
2010.
|
| Summary/Abstract |
China and the United States are tow countries with quite different histories, philosophies, values and political systems and because of these difference, the two countries have two quite different media. the most notable or maybe the most fundamental difference lies in the relationships of these tow media with their respective governments. The Chinese medium is often a part of the government and the US medium is basically preventively owned. This makes them almost two different things, like an apple and an orange. In most of the case, one can not use one as the standard to criticize the other and vice versa.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 3 |
ID:
099588
|
|
|
| 4 |
ID:
104226
|
|
|
|
|
| Publication |
2011.
|
| Summary/Abstract |
Democratic Peace and Democracy Exporting are two relatively young theories in the Western IR theory family. The authors believe both are questionable assertions. Democracy, whether as personal consciousness or a political mechanism, can only arise when the productivity of a nation reaches a certain level. Fundamentally, even if we agree with the assertion that democracy leads to peace, the real reason is level of productivity; democracy is only a result. Secondly, the close relationship between democracy and capitalism means that democracy can not be exported randomly. To treat democracy as a universally adaptable commodity exportable to any nation without considering the level of productivity can hardly be successful; in fact, it may be harmful to some nations.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 5 |
ID:
094083
|
|
|
| 6 |
ID:
075317
|
|
|
| 7 |
ID:
084166
|
|
|
| 8 |
ID:
083307
|
|
|
| 9 |
ID:
089241
|
|
|
| 10 |
ID:
091910
|
|
|
|
|
| Publication |
2009.
|
| Summary/Abstract |
This article puts forward a unified theory for international relations (IR). It first divides current western IR theories into hard and soft categories. then points out conceptual fallacies of the three major debates in the history of western IR theories by using this categorization as an analytical guide. It further asserts that such a categorization should help clarify the present theoretical chaos by pursuing a unified IR theoretical system.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 11 |
ID:
097849
|
|
|