|
Sort Order |
|
|
|
Items / Page
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Srl | Item |
1 |
ID:
178656
|
|
|
Summary/Abstract |
The field of climate and security has matured over the past 15 years, moving from the margins of academic research and policy discussion to become a more prominent concern for the international community. The practice of climate and security has a broad set of concerns extending beyond climate change and armed conflict. Different national governments, international organizations, and forums have sought to mainstream climate security concerns emphasizing a variety of challenges, including the risks to military bases, existential risks to low-lying island countries, resource competition, humanitarian emergencies, shocks to food security, migration, transboundary water management, and the risks of unintended consequences from climate policies. Despite greater awareness of these risks, the field still lacks good insights about what to do with these concerns, particularly in ‘fragile’ states with low capacity and exclusive political institutions.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
ID:
077468
|
|
|
Publication |
2007.
|
Summary/Abstract |
In an article based on her address to the Institute on 10 May 2007, the Foreign Secretary outlines the security threats that climate change poses. While conflict over resources is not new, the catastrophic scale of climate change, if unchecked, will lead to violence of vastly greater magnitude. As a result, new and innovative ideas must be developed to tackle the problem, including that many changes must come from within; we are all our own worst enemies.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3 |
ID:
091530
|
|
|
Publication |
2009.
|
Summary/Abstract |
China is undergoing modernization at a scale and speed the world has over witnessed. As climate change increasingly dominates the global agenda, China faces the challenge of shaping a new growth path in a climate-constrained world. The paper argues that China's current climate and energy strategies with co-benefits for the mitigation of climate change.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4 |
ID:
103044
|
|
|
5 |
ID:
115281
|
|
|
Publication |
2012.
|
Summary/Abstract |
Climate and environmental changes pose emerging and unique challenges to international security-as the global community experiences issues of food insecurity, severe droughts and floods-and have cascading impacts on energy supplies and infrastructure. Environmental hazards may shift abruptly, posing new risks to vulnerable systems and critical nodes in ways that diverge from historical experience. Effective risk assessments and planning will require understanding of how climate change will affect natural disasters and disaster response, and how hazards may be more extreme or unique from past experiences. This article discusses the role of climate change in affecting security planning from a military perspective, and how integration of scientific data and intelligence methods can foster assessment and effective response.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6 |
ID:
166908
|
|
|
Publication |
New Delhi, KAS Publication, 2008.
|
Description |
xii, 192p.pbk
|
Series |
KAS Publication Series no. 19
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Copies: C:1/I:0,R:0,Q:0
Circulation
Accession# | Call# | Current Location | Status | Policy | Location |
059692 | 333.79/SHA 059692 | Main | On Shelf | General | |
|
|
|
|
7 |
ID:
103195
|
|
|
Publication |
2011.
|
Summary/Abstract |
This article analyses the development of the European Union (EU) as a global actor in the area of climate security. Building on this, it explicitly draws on constructivist concepts such as norm entrepreneurship and epistemic communities. To this end, it adopts the framework of epistemic communities, as developed by Peter Haas, in order to suggest that there is a group of EU officials, EU member states and think-tank activists, who drive the climate security agenda of the EU. Thus, it examines the precise actors involved in this EU epistemic community for climate security. This group promotes a reason for action at the global level, resulting in the attempt to diffuse this norm: climate change has consequences for international security; thus, it requires the development of appropriate policies and capabilities within the EU and globally. This article suggests that the epistemic community on climate security has been effective at diffusing this norm at both levels, albeit with differences.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8 |
ID:
112412
|
|
|
Publication |
2012.
|
Summary/Abstract |
This article argues that a holistic approach is important when studying the European Union's (EU) role as an international security actor, but at the same time it identifies problems in adopting such a comprehensive research agenda. The holistic approach entails that the research must include 'new' security problems, such as climate change, but also relevant policies and instruments outside the framework of the Common Security and Defence Policy (CSDP). However, owing to conceptual, legal and political obstacles, this has been difficult to achieve; as a consequence, existing research on the EU as an international security actor tends to narrow down the focus to just one framework: the CSDP and its operations. This may lead to a distorted image, because the EU's role in international security surpasses any single policy framework. The contribution of this article is twofold. First, it sets the framework for the comprehensive research agenda concerning the EU as an international security actor. Second, it identifies key obstacles that are making this holistic approach methodologically and conceptually difficult. In this context, the Lisbon Treaty, formally abandoning the pillar structure of the EU, provides an opportunity to mitigate at least some of these roadblocks.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9 |
ID:
159164
|
|
|
Summary/Abstract |
Since the early 2000s, energy security has appeared frequently in Chinese policy statements. The focus is on security of supply, even if the discourse is becoming more attentive to other dimensions, such as environmental sustainability. Securitization theory can shed light on this specific threat construction and its implications for China and Chinese foreign policy. Applying securitization theory and reviewing existing debates, I show how the construction of an external threat and a focus on securing access to oil downplay other vulnerabilities and contribute to the perception among China's neighbors and others of a Chinese threat, despite new Chinese security discourses to the contrary. I argue that two factors contribute to this threat construction and its resilience: the role of national oil companies and the limited mobilizing power of environmental and climate security discourses.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10 |
ID:
183259
|
|
|
Summary/Abstract |
In the past year, climate change and national security have received significant attention from policymakers in the United States and the international community. Despite high-level meetings and statements on the topic, however, climate change is not yet fully mainstreamed into policymakers’ national-security agendas, particularly in areas related to geopolitical competition and governance. Better integration of climate-related predictive capabilities into national-security planning and the development of an interdisciplinary, scientifically literate national-security workforce are needed to address this gap.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11 |
ID:
141914
|
|
|
Summary/Abstract |
The standard narrative on modern geopolitics is being re-scripted. Previous ingredients that made up the literature on high politics such as securing resources, rivalries over the control of territory and war plans are increasingly being replaced instead by concerns about the ‘mundane’ politics of global energy plans, food systems, infrastructure and city design. Meaningful geopolitics in the time of climate change, in other words, would now have to grapple with the inescapable urgency for sustaining key ecological, biological and atmospheric indicators at the planetary level. If ‘planetary boundaries’ are being crossed in the Epoch of the Anthropocene, however, should governments in the global South and the developing world worry about becoming nations without borders?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12 |
ID:
090038
|
|
|
Publication |
2009.
|
Summary/Abstract |
Russia's European security initiative, aimed mainly at consolidating military security, has received a mixed reaction in the West. Nevertheless, in the course of future talks, it should be taken into account that the EU countries and the U.S. (especially with the B. Obama administration) give a broad interpretation to the security concept, including not only "tough" but also "soft" security.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13 |
ID:
075404
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|