Query Result Set
Skip Navigation Links
   ActiveUsers:454Hits:20566498Skip Navigation Links
Show My Basket
Contact Us
IDSA Web Site
Ask Us
Today's News
HelpExpand Help
Advanced search

  Hide Options
Sort Order Items / Page
EUROPEAN UNION SECURITY POLICY (2) answer(s).
 
SrlItem
1
ID:   075729


ESDP and civilian rapid reaction: adding value is harder than expected / Jakobsen, Peter Viggo   Journal Article
Jakobsen, Peter Viggo Journal Article
0 Rating(s) & 0 Review(s)
Publication 2006.
Summary/Abstract This article takes issue with the prevailing view that the ESDP capacity building process is easier and has been more successful in the civilian than in the military field. It argues that civilian capacity building is harder than military capacity building, demonstrates that the European Union's (EU's) civilian rapid reaction capacity is considerably smaller and less integrated than is generally assumed and that the capacity goals set for 2008 are unattainable. Yet another major EU expectations-capability gap has been created and there is now a real danger that this gap will seriously damage the EU's reputation as the global leader in civilian rapid reaction crisis management.
        Export Export
2
ID:   075728


Norway and the ESDP: Explaining norwegian participation in the EU's security policy / Rieker, Pernille   Journal Article
Rieker, Pernille Journal Article
0 Rating(s) & 0 Review(s)
Publication 2006.
Summary/Abstract This article aims to contribute to a better understanding of why various Norwegian governments of recent years have been willing to contribute to European Security and Defence Policy (ESDP) operations and integrate into the ESDP structures despite their country's increasingly limited access to the decision-making and/or decision-shaping process in this policy area. Norway participates in most of the ESDP structures in one way or the other-it contributes with troops and personnel to ESDP operations, participates in a battle group and has an association agreement with the European Defence Agency. The result of Norway's will to integrate is that, as a non-member, it has become more integrated into the ESDP structures than members such as Denmark, who have chosen to opt out from this policy area. How can this be explained? Does the Norwegian government decide to participate because that is seen as the best way of pursuing Norwegian national interests, or are there other institutional or normative explanations for this policy choice?
        Export Export