| Srl | Item |
| 1 |
ID:
092895
|
|
|
| 2 |
ID:
170975
|
|
|
|
|
| Summary/Abstract |
Ostensibly driven by concerns over a military standoff with China similar to Doklam, India increased military deployment at the Myanmar tri-junction. This article assesses the inevitability of systemic factors such as rivalry with China in determining India’s approach on border issues. It asks why India sought formalization of its boundary with Burma in 1967. Given its territorial disputes with China, resolving the Burma boundary should have been high priority. Still, it took India two decades after independence to broach the subject. Based on fresh archival and interview data, this article answers the question by examining the India–Burma Boundary Agreement. A three-party territorial dispute, the making of this agreement witnessed simultaneous interplay between states with visible power differentials, and various stakeholders within India’s polity and bureaucracy. The article argues that even when inter-state competition is apparent, domestic factors may be more important in triggering foreign policy change.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 3 |
ID:
103848
|
|
|
| 4 |
ID:
094451
|
|
|
| 5 |
ID:
108578
|
|
|
|
|
| Publication |
2011.
|
| Summary/Abstract |
The November 2008 terrorist attacks in Mumbai are analysed through six changing equations in India-Pakistan relations. The balance between military response and inaction is shifting towards the former. India has a vested but no longer critical interest in a strong and stable Pakistan. Pakistan's deniability has been based on separation between the government, army, ISI and terrorists whose plausibility is fading. To reverse the worsening security situation, Pakistan's military must be brought under full civilian control. Failing that, India will have to acquire the military capacity and political will to destroy the human and material infrastructure of terrorism in Pakistan. Finally, the rewards for Pakistan's contributions to the war on terror in Afghanistan exceed penalties for its fuelling of terror in India. The structure of incentives and penalties must be reversed.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 6 |
ID:
003061
|
|
|
|
|
| Publication |
New York, St.Martin's Press, 1993.
|
| Description |
xvi, 320p.
|
| Standard Number |
0312085281
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Copies: C:1/I:0,R:0,Q:0
Circulation
| Accession# | Call# | Current Location | Status | Policy | Location |
| 034510 | 355.030954/MAL 034510 | Main | On Shelf | General | |
|
|
|
|
| 7 |
ID:
104664
|
|
|
| 8 |
ID:
101077
|
|
|
|
|
| Publication |
2010.
|
| Summary/Abstract |
This article explores how it became possible for the former Indian Prime Minister, Atal Behari Vajpayee, to make a major trust-building initiative with his Pakistani counterpart, Nawaz Sharif, at the 1999 Lahore Summit. Building on security dilemma theorizing in the field of International Relations, the present article develops the concept of a "leap of trust" as a way of understanding how decision-makers trapped in security dilemmas might break through the psychology of distrust by a frame-breaking conciliatory move. This framework is then applied to the moves that led to the development of a trusting relationship between Sharif and Vajpayee. A few months later, Pakistan launched an attack across the Line of Control (LoC) and Vajpayee felt betrayed. I explore how far Sharif knew about his army's plans to attack at Kargil and ask whether he was prisoner of a Pakistani military machine that was intent on pursuing a military solution in Kashmir irrespective of any peace process that might be developing. The article examines the lessons that Vajpayee drew from Kargil and discusses his two further attempts to recover the trust that had developed at Lahore. I conclude with an analysis of the wider lessons of this case for the success of any future leaps of trust that Indian and Pakistani leaders might take.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 9 |
ID:
104314
|
|
|
| 10 |
ID:
099729
|
|
|
|
|
| Publication |
New York, Palgrave Macmillan, 2010.
|
| Description |
xvii, 266p.
|
| Standard Number |
9780230619371
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Copies: C:1/I:0,R:0,Q:0
Circulation
| Accession# | Call# | Current Location | Status | Policy | Location |
| 055357 | 327.5405491/MIS 055357 | Main | On Shelf | General | |
|
|
|
|
| 11 |
ID:
094772
|
|
|
| 12 |
ID:
099728
|
|
|
|
|
| Publication |
Hampshire, Ashgate Publishing, 2008.
|
| Description |
viii, 159p.
|
| Standard Number |
9780754674375
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Copies: C:1/I:0,R:0,Q:0
Circulation
| Accession# | Call# | Current Location | Status | Policy | Location |
| 055358 | 327.5405491/MCL 055358 | Main | On Shelf | General | |
|
|
|
|
| 13 |
ID:
088233
|
|
|
|
|
| Publication |
Hampshire, Ashgate, 2009.
|
| Description |
159p.
|
| Standard Number |
9780754674375
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Copies: C:1/I:0,R:0,Q:0
Circulation
| Accession# | Call# | Current Location | Status | Policy | Location |
| 054192 | 327.5405491/MCL 054192 | Main | On Shelf | General | |
|
|
|
|
| 14 |
ID:
104607
|
|
|
| 15 |
ID:
101726
|
|
|
| 16 |
ID:
092675
|
|
|
| 17 |
ID:
104312
|
|
|
| 18 |
ID:
051128
|
|
|
|
|
| Publication |
New Delhi, Indus Publishing House, 2001.
|
| Description |
312p.
|
| Standard Number |
8173871167
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Copies: C:1/I:0,R:0,Q:0
Circulation
| Accession# | Call# | Current Location | Status | Policy | Location |
| 045125 | 355.033054/BUD 045125 | Main | On Shelf | General | |
|
|
|
|
| 19 |
ID:
091940
|
|
|
| 20 |
ID:
083459
|
|
|
|
|
| Publication |
New Delhi, Isha Books, 2008.
|
| Description |
x, 298p.
|
| Standard Number |
8182054389
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Copies: C:1/I:0,R:0,Q:0
Circulation
| Accession# | Call# | Current Location | Status | Policy | Location |
| 053884 | 327.54/TRI 053884 | Main | On Shelf | General | |
|
|
|
|