| Srl | Item |
| 1 |
ID:
131714
|
|
|
|
|
| Publication |
2014.
|
| Summary/Abstract |
Mindful of increased reliance on undersea data networks, the US defence advanced research projects agency (DAPRA) has begun a programme to develop a demonstrate novel technologies that can temporally restore network connectivity in contested environments.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 2 |
ID:
147575
|
|
|
| 3 |
ID:
018043
|
|
|
|
|
| Publication |
Aug 2000.
|
| Description |
113-150
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 4 |
ID:
108725
|
|
|
|
|
| Publication |
2011.
|
| Summary/Abstract |
A defining theme of defence intelligence in the UK during the early Cold War was the Service Departments' resistance to the concept of integrated intelligence. This article explains how this capability was achieved only with the amalgamation of the three Service Departments within a unified Ministry of Defence with overarching strategic and financial authority. It offers a critical analysis of the 1960 Templer review of Service intelligence, the creation of the Defence Intelligence Staff in April 1964, and its further restructuring on a functional basis in August 1965 by the Secretary of State, Denis Healey.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 5 |
ID:
158764
|
|
|
| 6 |
ID:
147577
|
|
|
|
|
| Summary/Abstract |
Geoffrey Vickers is the forgotten man of British intelligence. As the UK’s economic intelligence supremo at the Ministry of Economic Warfare and the Foreign Office between 1941 and 1945, Vickers transformed the craft of economic intelligence in both strategic and operational spheres. In the policy arena he was the driving force behind the economic and industrial planning of civil administration of liberated Europe. Vickers was also an intelligence theorist of the first rank whose legacy survived in his holistic conception of economic intelligence, its centrality to decision-making in peace and war, and the scope and evolution of the Joint Intelligence Bureau and defence intelligence.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 7 |
ID:
190491
|
|
|
|
|
| Publication |
New Delhi, Pentagon Press, 2023.
|
| Description |
xvii, 310p.hbk
|
| Standard Number |
9789390095803
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Copies: C:1/I:0,R:0,Q:0
Circulation
| Accession# | Call# | Current Location | Status | Policy | Location |
| 060359 | 355.54/BAN 060359 | Main | On Shelf | General | |
|
|
|
|
| 8 |
ID:
017952
|
|
|
|
|
| Publication |
Nov 2000.
|
| Description |
1397-1410
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 9 |
ID:
133497
|
|
|
|
|
| Publication |
2014.
|
| Summary/Abstract |
With the new government's emphasis on the defence modernisation, Indian Army's long awaited procurements like Tactical Communication Systems (TCS) and Battlefield Management System (BMS) could see light of the day very soon. Although the focus so far has been on the weapon platforms, the new government must soon realise that communication systems have been lagging far behind. Better Command, Control, Communications, Computers, Intelligence, Surveillance and Reconnaissance systems (C4I2SR) are the need of the hour for the armed forces, especially the Indian Army.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 10 |
ID:
008496
|
|
|
| 11 |
ID:
111181
|
|
|
|
|
| Publication |
2012.
|
| Summary/Abstract |
In 1946 veteran British intelligence officer Kenneth Strong undertook the Directorship of a new intelligence organization, the Joint Intelligence Bureau (JIB). The JIB absorbed the responsibilities of several wartime intelligence organs, and was responsible for economic, topographic, and aspects of scientific intelligence on an inter-service basis. Its responsibilities grew over the following 18 years; most notably, it absorbed atomic intelligence in 1957. When the Defence Intelligence Staff was created in 1964, absorbing the JIB and the individual Service agencies, JIB was at its heart and Kenneth Strong its first Director. The organization conducted key work in the early Cold War, was at the centre of an international network of Joint Intelligence Bureaux, and was an important stepping stone in the movement to centralize military and military-relevant intelligence in Britain - but the historiography pays it surprisingly little attention. This paper introduces the JIB and various aspects of its work, and demonstrates that its low profile in the historiography is unjustified.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 12 |
ID:
046962
|
|
|
|
|
| Publication |
New Delhi, Institute for Defence Studies and Analysis, 2001.
|
| Description |
vii, 96p.
|
| Standard Number |
8186019413
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Copies: C:1/I:0,R:0,Q:0
Circulation
| Accession# | Call# | Current Location | Status | Policy | Location |
| 044271 | 355.40954/ANA 044271 | Main | Withdrawn | General | |
|
|
|
|
| 13 |
ID:
131715
|
|
|
|
|
| Publication |
2014.
|
| Summary/Abstract |
The NATO communications and information agency (NCI Agency) has selected a bid from Czech republic based ERA to fulfil the alliance's deployable passive ESM tracker (DPET) requirement for Air C2 surveillance and identification.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 14 |
ID:
147576
|
|
|
|
|
| Summary/Abstract |
The following article argues that defence intelligence in general, and Britain’s Defence Intelligence (DI) organization in particular, represents an area in intelligence studies that is significantly under-investigated. It makes the case that the significance of understanding defence intelligence and DI lies not only in a general lack of illumination but also because DI is subject to and prompts a range of difficulties and challenges that are either especially acute in the defence context or have ramifications for the wider intelligence community that remain to be fully appreciated. Particular attention is given to DI’s remit being divided between Ministry of Defence and national requirements, problems of fixed-sum resourcing an intelligence function with national responsibilities that is subordinate to Departmental spending structures and priorities, fraught positioning of defence intelligence in Departmental line management and, finally, a chronic lack of public or official interest or scrutiny. The article concludes that the UK’s experience has echoes elsewhere, notably in the US, and that wider international study of defence intelligence is both long overdue and may have implications for understanding of national and wider intelligence institutions and processes.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 15 |
ID:
147578
|
|
|
|
|
| Summary/Abstract |
The Defence Intelligence Staff’s closest relative was the Joint intelligence Bureau. The Bureau was created in 1946 as part of the post war reorganization of the intelligence machinery, consolidating a number of wartime organizations. It was a centralized organization, providing defence intelligence to customers in the armed forces and government. The Bureau was founded with the objective of implementing several lessons that had been identified in the Second World War concerning the organization and management of intelligence. This paper examines the particular lessons the Bureau’s founders and its leader had learned, and the ideas they sought to ingrain in the organization. It asks what kind of foundation the Bureau provided for the DIS, when it merged with the service intelligence directorates in 1964.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|