|
|
|
Sort Order |
|
|
|
Items / Page
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Srl | Item |
| 1 |
ID:
076096
|
|
|
|
|
| Publication |
Ithica, Cornell University Press, 2006.
|
| Description |
viii, 325p.
|
| Series |
Cornell studies in political economy
|
| Standard Number |
9780801472503
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Copies: C:1/I:0,R:0,Q:0
Circulation
| Accession# | Call# | Current Location | Status | Policy | Location |
| 052404 | 327.520509051/KAT 052404 | Main | On Shelf | General | |
|
|
|
|
| 2 |
ID:
088071
|
|
|
|
|
| Publication |
New York, Columbia University Press, 1996.
|
| Description |
xv, 562p.
|
| Contents |
For the graduate students at cornell.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Copies: C:1/I:0,R:0,Q:0
Circulation
| Accession# | Call# | Current Location | Status | Policy | Location |
| 043587 | 355.03/KAT 043587 | Main | On Shelf | General | |
|
|
|
|
| 3 |
ID:
134466
|
|
|
|
|
| Summary/Abstract |
The article provides a reminiscence of Karl Deutsch as a teacher and scholar. I examine his scholarship and focus on its enduring qualities. In particular, I highlight how he was a passionate advocate of innovative approaches to enduring political problems. His comprehensive theoretical vision, with central concepts such as communication and learning, remains as inspiring as his methodological eclecticism. It offers a synthesis of traditional sociology of the Europe he had left behind with the rationalist empiricism that he encountered in America.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 4 |
ID:
124386
|
|
|
|
|
| Publication |
2013.
|
| Summary/Abstract |
In recent years U.S. legal norms and practices reconfigured important elements of how law is thought of and practiced in both common and civil law countries around the world. With specific focus on the spread of American procedural practices (class action and pretrial discovery), this article applies a transactional view of law that emphasizes the private practice of law and nonstate actors. Such an approach highlights important aspects of world politics overlooked by traditional analyses of international legalization, conventionally understood as the direct spread of law by and among states. We find that the movement of law is a dynamic process involving diffusion, translation, and the repeated transnational exchanges of legal actors. Through our examination of this process, we offer insights into how aspects of American law moved into unlikely jurisdictions to reshape legal theory, pedagogy, procedure, and the organizing structure of the legal profession.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 5 |
ID:
083566
|
|
|
|
|
| Publication |
London, Routledge, 2008.
|
| Description |
xiv, 290p.
|
| Series |
Security and governance
|
| Standard Number |
9780415773959
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Copies: C:1/I:0,R:0,Q:0
Circulation
| Accession# | Call# | Current Location | Status | Policy | Location |
| 053975 | 355.033052/KAT 053975 | Main | On Shelf | General | |
|
|
|
|
| 6 |
ID:
060514
|
|
|
|
|
| Publication |
Stanford, Standford University Press, 2004.
|
| Description |
273p.
|
| Series |
Studies in Asian security
|
| Standard Number |
0804749795
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Copies: C:1/I:0,R:0,Q:0
Circulation
| Accession# | Call# | Current Location | Status | Policy | Location |
| 049491 | 355.03305/SUH 049491 | Main | On Shelf | General | |
|
|
|
|
| 7 |
ID:
162635
|
|
|
|
|
| Summary/Abstract |
This article makes its case against the reliance on binaries that is pervading our analytical and political conceptual universe under a variety of labels—Western vs Non-Western, West vs Rest, and Occident vs. Orient. These reductions are misleading as analytical short-cuts and pernicious as political projects. Theoretical complementarity provides us instead with an opportunity to divide our labor, extend our causal arguments, and show a measure of humility as we advance unavoidably limited theoretical claims. This argument is presented in two steps. In the first section, this article inquires into the distinction between Western and Non-Western International Relations Theory. In the second section, it discusses common knowledge and theories and tacit knowledge and world views. In both sections, the article argues for an approach to the two types of knowledge that is complementary, not binary.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 8 |
ID:
131501
|
|
|
|
|
| Publication |
2014.
|
| Summary/Abstract |
The distinction between uncertainty and risk, originally drawn by Frank Knight and John Maynard Keynes in the 1920s, remains fundamentally important today. In the presence of uncertainty, market actors and economic policy-makers substitute other methods of decision making for rational calculation-specifically, actors' decisions are rooted in social conventions. Drawing from innovations in financial markets and deliberations among top American monetary authorities in the years before the 2008 crisis, we show how economic actors and policy-makers live in worlds of risk and uncertainty. In that world social conventions deserve much greater attention than conventional IPE analyses accords them. Such conventions must be part of our toolkit as we seek to understand the preferences and strategies of economic and political actors.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|