| Srl | Item |
| 1 |
ID:
090470
|
|
|
|
|
| Publication |
2009.
|
| Summary/Abstract |
Military science has always tried to interpret war in terms of a philosophical category, identity the conditions and factors affecting it, and look into patterns and laws governing the origins, course, and outcome of war.
Going to the true causes of war and the most typical differences generating tensions in political and economic relation between countries culminating and manifesting in war between them in the principal challenge of this scientific search. A very important consideration here is to evaluate correctly the scope of influence that the potentialities of the warring countries, specific of the theaters of operation, and the opponents ' political aims have on he general character of future wars and their course and end results
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 2 |
ID:
164265
|
|
|
|
|
| Summary/Abstract |
This article examines the Russian military involvement on land in Syria and in the Eastern Mediterranean Sea. It considers, in particular, why the point is constantly being made in Russian political and military circles that these two commitments will be ‘permanent’ in nature. It begins by providing the rationales for the initial establishment of a Russian Eastern Mediterranean naval flotilla and the later sending of ground troops with air support to Syria. It goes on to show what benefits — geopolitical, political, military, and, in particular, strategic — have accrued to Russia from the combination of these two missions. The article concludes by showing that these benefits are too substantial for any Russian political leader to contemplate a withdrawal from Syria at any point in the foreseeable future.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 3 |
ID:
191506
|
|
|
|
|
| Summary/Abstract |
This paper provides a brief description of a strategic multi-domain operation by US and NATO forces; its goals, objectives, content, and emanating threats to Russia's national security; and possible measures to counteract it with the participation of the Strategic Missile Forces.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 4 |
ID:
077798
|
|
|
|
|
| Publication |
2007.
|
| Summary/Abstract |
The U.S. Department of Defense is implementing the 2001 Nuclear Posture Review's requirement to create a "New Triad" of offensive and defensive capabilities. Advocates assert the new posture is necessary to change U.S. deterrence posture from a "one-size-fits-all" plan focused on the Soviet Union to a global posture designed to better deter or defeat all sizes and types of adversaries. This article describes how new policy guidance is reshaping U.S. strategic planning, converting the top-heavy Cold War Single Integrated Operational Plan into a "family" of smaller, flexible plans designed to threaten potential adversaries anywhere on earth and explores how the responses of these adversaries may help to undermine the nonproliferation regime.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|