Query Result Set
Skip Navigation Links
   ActiveUsers:1240Hits:19119376Skip Navigation Links
Show My Basket
Contact Us
IDSA Web Site
Ask Us
Today's News
HelpExpand Help
Advanced search
  Hide Options
Sort Order Items / Page
TAILORED DETERRENCE (4) answer(s).
 
SrlItem
1
ID:   132280


Deterrence and overseas stability / Stone, John   Journal Article
Stone, John Journal Article
0 Rating(s) & 0 Review(s)
Publication 2014.
Summary/Abstract The use of conventional armed forces in a deterrent role merits close consideration. Instability in weak or failing states can have global ramifications, while efforts to build stability take time. In principle, conventional deterrence can be used to buy the time required for such stabilization efforts. Attempts at deterrence will, however, need to overcome credibility problems stemming from the technical limitations associated with conventional armed forces, and with the likely requirement for multiple external actors to deter multiple intrastate audiences. While deterrence might work under certain circumstances, it will not play as central a role in strategy as it did during the Cold War.
        Export Export
2
ID:   121969


Limits of tailored deterrence / Larkin, Sean P   Journal Article
Larkin, Sean P Journal Article
0 Rating(s) & 0 Review(s)
Publication 2011.
        Export Export
3
ID:   092485


Strategic culture and tailored deterrence: bridging the gap between theory and practice / Lantis, Jeffrey S   Journal Article
Lantis, Jeffrey S Journal Article
0 Rating(s) & 0 Review(s)
Publication 2009.
Summary/Abstract Critics charge that American deterrence and counter-proliferation strategies failed to stem the tide of national security threats or hinder the spread of weapons of mass destruction over the past decade.
        Export Export
4
ID:   077798


U S strategic war planning after 9/11 / Kristensen, Hans M   Journal Article
Kristensen, Hans M Journal Article
0 Rating(s) & 0 Review(s)
Publication 2007.
Summary/Abstract The U.S. Department of Defense is implementing the 2001 Nuclear Posture Review's requirement to create a "New Triad" of offensive and defensive capabilities. Advocates assert the new posture is necessary to change U.S. deterrence posture from a "one-size-fits-all" plan focused on the Soviet Union to a global posture designed to better deter or defeat all sizes and types of adversaries. This article describes how new policy guidance is reshaping U.S. strategic planning, converting the top-heavy Cold War Single Integrated Operational Plan into a "family" of smaller, flexible plans designed to threaten potential adversaries anywhere on earth and explores how the responses of these adversaries may help to undermine the nonproliferation regime.
        Export Export