Query Result Set
Skip Navigation Links
   ActiveUsers:1579Hits:19813844Skip Navigation Links
Show My Basket
Contact Us
IDSA Web Site
Ask Us
Today's News
HelpExpand Help
Advanced search

  Hide Options
Sort Order Items / Page
SURVEY DATA (6) answer(s).
 
SrlItem
1
ID:   084943


Determinants of popular support for Iran's nuclear program: insights from a nationally representative survey / Fair, C Christine; Shellman, Stephen M   Journal Article
Fair, C Christine Journal Article
0 Rating(s) & 0 Review(s)
Publication 2008.
Summary/Abstract Iran's nuclear programme has brought ever-sharpening conflict with Israel, the United States, and the European Union. The Iranian public has been actively drawn into this debate, as the Iranian government cultivates support for its actions and by foreign appeals for change (including Bush administration support for regime change). This article explores data relating to public support for Iran's nuclear program. We utilize data from a nationally representative, face-to-face poll fielded in Iran in late 2006. The poll (n = 1,000) queried respondents about numerous domestic and external security concerns, including Iran's 'full nuclear fuel cycle' program. We present data on Iranian beliefs about Iran's nuclear program and the determinants of those beliefs. After discussing poll methodology and data integrity, the paper presents summary statistics on key variables about the nuclear program. We estimate three logit models to explain respondent beliefs about the program. The dependent variables address support for the program, the economic importance of the nuclear program, and beliefs that Iran will weaponize. Iranians' support for the program correlates with perceived status and deterrence benefits conferred by the program and opinions of the United States. Respondents' concerns about Israel do not drive support for the program. The paper concludes with a discussion of lessons learned from this study for future work of this type in Iran or other coercive environments.
Key Words Iran  United States  Nuclear Programme  Survey Data  Conflict Analysis 
        Export Export
2
ID:   078235


do workforce and organizational practices explain the manufactu / Watkins, Todd A   Journal Article
Watkins, Todd A Journal Article
0 Rating(s) & 0 Review(s)
Publication 2007.
Summary/Abstract This paper explores whether defense contractors' manufacturing technology advantages over purely commercial firms might be associated with differences in their workforce and organizational practices. It uses unique original data collected specifically to test workforce and organizational complementarities in implementation of advanced manufacturing technology in small manufacturers. Findings are that defense contractors: (1) have higher and deeper rates of advanced manufacturing technology use; (2) have greater perceived success in achieving manufacturing goals; (3) are more likely practitioners across a diverse spectrum of advanced workforce and organizational practices. Then, (4) econometrically, the defense contractors' higher reported levels of achievement in implementing advanced manufacturing technologies are positively associated with those organizational and workforce practice differences
        Export Export
3
ID:   118530


Does social capital increase public support for economic global / Spilker, Gabriele; Schaffer, Lena Maria; Bernauer, Thomas   Journal Article
Bernauer, Thomas Journal Article
0 Rating(s) & 0 Review(s)
Publication 2012.
Summary/Abstract The dominant explanation of public attitudes vis-à-vis economic globalisation focuses on re-distributional implications, with an emphasis on factor endowments and government-sponsored safety nets (the compensation hypothesis). The empirical implication of these theoretical arguments is that in advanced economies, on which this article focuses, individuals endowed with less human and financial capital will be more likely to experience income losses. Hence they will oppose economic openness unless they are compensated by the government. It is argued here that including social capital in the analysis can fill two gaps in explanations relying on factor endowments and the compensation hypothesis. First, generalised trust - one key aspect of social capital - constitutes a personal endowment alongside human and financial capital. Second, structural social capital - another key aspect of social capital - can be regarded as a nongovernmental social safety net that can compensate for endowment-related disadvantages of individuals. Both aspects of social capital are expected to contribute, for distinct reasons, to more positive views on economic openness. The empirical testing relies on survey data for two countries: Switzerland and the United States. For both countries, the results indicate that generalised trust has a strong, positive effect on public opinion of economic globalisation, whereas structural social capital has no effect.
        Export Export
4
ID:   177999


European nuclear weapons? zombie debates and nuclear realities / Egeland, Kjolv; Pelopidas, Benoit   Journal Article
Pelopidas, Benoit Journal Article
0 Rating(s) & 0 Review(s)
Summary/Abstract In February 2020, French president Emmanuel Macron invited all interested European states to a “strategic dialogue” on the supposed contribution of France’s nuclear arsenal to European collective security. While certain media commentators relayed Macron’s intervention with approbation and excitement, framing the proposal as an exciting new idea that, if implemented, might boost Europe’s clout on the world stage, the dominant reaction was one of ennui. After all, the argument for Euro-nukes is far from new. In fact, several (mostly French) actors have unsuccessfully attempted to persuade European policymakers of the necessity of European nuclear weapons cooperation for more than half a century. In this article, we investigate the history, merits, and longevity of the case for European nuclear arms. Drawing on secondary literature, policymakers’ writings, and two hitherto untapped surveys of European public opinion conducted by one of the authors, we argue that the case for Euro-nukes is critically flawed with respect to security, strategic autonomy, futurity, and democratic good governance. We maintain that the continuous resurfacing of the “zombie” case for Euro-nukes is made possible by powerful organisational interests, as well as conceptual reversification resulting in enduring contradictions between nuclear vulnerabilities and claims of protection and autonomy.
        Export Export
5
ID:   129830


On the determinants of terrorism risk concern in Europe / Drakos, Konstantinos; Mueller, Catherine   Journal Article
Drakos, Konstantinos Journal Article
0 Rating(s) & 0 Review(s)
Publication 2014.
Summary/Abstract We investigate whether differences in terrorism risk are mirrored on terrorism risk perception across European countries for the period 2003-2007. We find that the average propensity for terrorism risk concern is affected by actual risk levels. Country and individual heterogeneity contribute substantially to the variation of observed risk perception. Singles and individuals with white collar jobs are less likely to mention terrorism as one of the most pressing issues their country faces, while political positioning towards the right makes it more likely to be concerned about terrorism. As far as competing risks are concerned, we find that the likelihood terrorism is mentioned, decreases with spending on pensions as a percentage of GDP being higher. Finally, based on the Bayesian framework, we also examined the formation of terrorism risk perceptions, and decompose the observed country-level time series of terrorism activity into a long- and a short-run component. We concluded that the observed risk perception variation is only explained by the long-term trend of terrorism activity countries face.
        Export Export
6
ID:   186445


What drives households’ choices of residential solar photovoltaic capacity? / Shimada, Hideki; Honda, Tomonori   Journal Article
HidekiShimada Journal Article
0 Rating(s) & 0 Review(s)
Summary/Abstract Enhancing residential solar photovoltaic adoption greatly contributes to the energy sector's decarbonization. However, even though expanding the capacity will increase the amount of solar-derived energy, little is known about what drives households' capacity choice. To bridge this knowledge gap, the current study utilizes revealed data provided by a Japanese solar photovoltaic installer on households' capacity choices and conducts a survey of households that have installed solar photovoltaic systems through diverse installers. The descriptive evidence shows that the Japanese feed-in tariff implemented in 2012 drastically expanded capacity per installation. The revealed data also record house attributes, meteorological information, and municipality demographic variables, on which we regress the solar photovoltaic capacity. We found that capacity is determined by the marginal cost and marginal benefit of installing an additional capacity. The survey results suggest that installers play a critical role in determining capacity through recommendations, once they gain households' trust. Thus, policy interventions that incentivize installers to expand capacity can enhance the generation of solar-derived energy.
        Export Export