| Srl | Item |
| 1 |
ID:
101573
|
|
|
|
|
| Publication |
London, Routledge, 2009.
|
| Description |
4 Vol. Set.; p
|
| Contents |
Vol. 1: 1917-1967
Vol. 2: 1967-1991
Vol. 3: Major themes
Vol. 4: 1991-2007
|
| Standard Number |
978041544038, hbk
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Copies: C:4/I:0,R:4,Q:0
Circulation
| Accession# | Call# | Current Location | Status | Policy | Location |
| 055620 | 956.94054/DUM 055620 | Main | On Shelf | Reference books | |
| 055621 | 956.94054/DUM 055621 | Main | On Shelf | Reference books | |
| 055622 | 956.94054/DUM 055622 | Main | On Shelf | Reference books | |
| 055623 | 956.94054/DUM 055623 | Main | On Shelf | Reference books | |
|
|
|
|
| 2 |
ID:
111226
|
|
|
|
|
| Publication |
2012.
|
| Summary/Abstract |
The past ten years have witnessed the collapse of Palestinian political authority and leadership in East Jerusalem. Evidence suggests that the Islamic Movement is beginning to fill this vacuum from within Israel. This article examines the growing involvement of the Islamic Movement of Israel in Jerusalem, both in terms of discourse and specific facts on the ground. It explores how the al-Aqsa mosque has been employed, particularly by Shaykh Ra'id Salah, as a symbol for political empowerment, a site for public contestation, and a focus for religious renewal. It debates whether their presence should be perceived as a growing strategic threat, part of an Islamizing trend, or rather as a consequence of weak local leadership, the unintended consequences of the separation wall and the non-recognition of the Hamas government.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 3 |
ID:
078328
|
|
|
|
|
| Publication |
London, Lynne Rienner, 2007.
|
| Description |
xii, 233p.
|
| Standard Number |
9781588264749
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Copies: C:1/I:0,R:0,Q:0
Circulation
| Accession# | Call# | Current Location | Status | Policy | Location |
| 052513 | 362.870899274/DUM 052513 | Main | On Shelf | General | |
|
|
|
|
| 4 |
ID:
123891
|
|
|
|
|
| Publication |
2013.
|
| Summary/Abstract |
The study of conflict in cities has emerged as a significant subfield in a number of disciplines. For policy-makers and analysts concerned with humanitarian interventions in cities emerging from conflict, the city as a form of human organization and its impact upon the establishment of security is of particular importance.
Less academic attention has been given to divided cities where the legitimacy of the state authority controlling the city is, itself, in question and where stabilization and the establishment of security is protracted. The adoption of integrative and inclusive approaches to policing becomes a key component in security regimes in divided cities. In these cases, however, to what extent should the stabilization phase be recast? Is the law enforcement phase subsumed and over-ridden by national security concerns?
This article examines these questions by suggesting a number of security models which have been used in a range of divided cities. It focuses in more detail on a study of Israeli policing in the Palestinian areas of East Jerusalem occupied by Israel after 1967 to draw some broader conclusions about the nature of the security regime in Jerusalem and other divided cities inside contested states.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 5 |
ID:
117833
|
|
|
|
|
| Publication |
2012.
|
| Summary/Abstract |
This article problematises international heritage interventions in divided cities through exploring UNESCO's role in Jerusalem's Old City. It examines the tension between universal heritage values and protocols and nationalist agendas which often involve politicised archaeological responses. Drawing on comparative case studies of UNESCO-affiliated projects in Fez and Aleppo, and in the violently divided cities and regions of Mostar and Kosovo, it assesses future challenges and possibilities facing UNESCO in Jerusalem. While the article confirms an increased need for an international arbitrator and protector for the city's sacred sites and divided cultural heritage, it also underscores the limitations of UNESCO's legal remit and the political sensitivities which hinder its praxis.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|