| Srl | Item |
| 1 |
ID:
082514
|
|
|
|
|
| Publication |
Hampshire, Palgrave Macmillan, 2007.
|
| Description |
xvi, 234p.
|
| Standard Number |
9781403976246
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Copies: C:1/I:0,R:0,Q:0
Circulation
| Accession# | Call# | Current Location | Status | Policy | Location |
| 053639 | 327.51052/HSI 053639 | Main | On Shelf | General | |
|
|
|
|
| 2 |
ID:
135195
|
|
|
|
|
| Publication |
New Delhi, Magnum Books Pvt Ltd, 2014.
|
| Description |
165p.Pbk
|
| Contents |
In association with Institute for Defence Studies and Analyses
|
| Standard Number |
9789382512240
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Copies: C:2/I:0,R:0,Q:0
Circulation
| Accession# | Call# | Current Location | Status | Policy | Location |
| 058023 | 915.1/JAG 058023 | Main | On Shelf | General | |
| 058024 | 915.1/JAG 058024 | Main | On Shelf | General | |
|
|
|
|
| 3 |
ID:
139814
|
|
|
|
|
| Publication |
New Delhi, Magnum Books Pvt Ltd, 2015.
|
| Description |
299p.Pbk
|
| Contents |
In association with Institute for Defence Studies and Analyses
|
| Standard Number |
9789382512264
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Copies: C:2/I:0,R:0,Q:0
Circulation
| Accession# | Call# | Current Location | Status | Policy | Location |
| 058255 | 915.1/SIN 058255 | Main | On Shelf | General | |
| 058256 | 915.1/SIN 058256 | Main | On Shelf | General | |
|
|
|
|
| 4 |
ID:
079507
|
|
|
|
|
| Publication |
Cheltenham, Edward Elgar, 2007.
|
| Description |
xi, 247p.
|
| Standard Number |
9781847201126
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Copies: C:1/I:0,R:0,Q:0
Circulation
| Accession# | Call# | Current Location | Status | Policy | Location |
| 052882 | 303.48251052/HEA 052882 | Main | On Shelf | General | |
|
|
|
|
| 5 |
ID:
083308
|
|
|
| 6 |
ID:
052148
|
|
|
|
|
| Publication |
London, routledgeCurzon, 2003.
|
| Description |
xvi, 245p.
|
| Series |
Nissan Institute/RoutledgeCurzon Japanese studies series
|
| Standard Number |
0415305071
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Copies: C:1/I:0,R:0,Q:0
Circulation
| Accession# | Call# | Current Location | Status | Policy | Location |
| 046269 | 355.033052/DRI 046269 | Main | On Shelf | General | |
|
|
|
|
| 7 |
ID:
090631
|
|
|
|
|
| Publication |
2009.
|
| Summary/Abstract |
In contemporary East Asia, political rivalry between China and Japan is often discussed. However, little has been done to systematically analyze the bilateral relationship and possible conflict escalation. In this paper, I employ the multiple-hierarchy model of regional politics offered by power transition theorists, in order to examine the recent Sino-Japanese relationship. After examining the effect of the factors suggested by the theory, I conclude that China's rise does not pose immediate destabilizing effects on regional security because the relative rise of China's capability is at best moderate. I also argue that the dyadic relationship has been pacified by several factors such as interest similarity and defense-dominant geography, in spite of China's overall rise. Finally, I offer some policy recommendations suggested by the theory-driven analysis
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 8 |
ID:
104647
|
|
|
| 9 |
ID:
078349
|
|
|
|
|
| Publication |
Stanford, Stanford University Press, 2006.
|
| Description |
xvii, 477p.
|
| Standard Number |
0804754594
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Copies: C:1/I:0,R:0,Q:0
Circulation
| Accession# | Call# | Current Location | Status | Policy | Location |
| 052530 | 327.5105209049/WAN 052530 | Main | On Shelf | General | |
|
|
|
|
| 10 |
ID:
093903
|
|
|
| 11 |
ID:
105314
|
|
|
| 12 |
ID:
101631
|
|
|
|
|
| Publication |
2010.
|
| Summary/Abstract |
From the late 1990s to the late 2000s, scholarly literature and media analysis shifted from representing the Sino-Japanese relationship as generally "good," to portraying it as generally "bad," and then back to describing it as generally "good" again. This article aims to make sense of what could thus be construed as fluctuations in Sino-Japanese relations and Japan's China policy, through employing discourse analysis as foreign policy theory. The aim is operationalized by analyzing Japanese China discourse as it has played out in the Diet. The article demonstrates that there is a fault line between a "radical representation," epitomizing further politicization of a prevalent Japanese sense of insecurity about China, and a "moderate representation," reflecting de-politicization of the same phenomenon. Furthermore, it shows that in the period examined (a) China has come to be discussed more frequently, and (b) a greater variety of aspects of the relationship have reached the political agenda. Together, these two changes have been conducive in altering the relative position of the two representations. In 2008 the moderate representation was still dominant, but less so than in 1999. The main argument of this article is thus that recent fluctuations in Japan's China policy-and by implication Sino-Japanese relations-can be understood in terms of an increasingly open Japanese China discourse.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|