Srl | Item |
1 |
ID:
022620
|
|
|
Publication |
April 2002.
|
Description |
91-110
|
Summary/Abstract |
How did India achieve prominence and global competitiveness informational technologies (IT) when its record in other technology sectors has been lackluster? Conventional arguments emphasizing comparative advantage, export-led growth and the absence of state intervention, while important, have limited explanatory power. State policies, in particular, investments in higher education and public R&D institutions, a historical compromise on the English language, regulatory polices all played a role. In addition, the article emphasizes the positive network and reputational effects of the Indian diaspora (especially in Silicon Valley) to the development of the sector. It concludes by examining the broader consequences of this sector's success for India. An important direct effect is the likely emergence of India as a significant player in tradable services. However, the indirect effects such as legitimizing capitalism, spurring competition among Indian states, and giving the country a greater measure of self-confidence, may be more important.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
ID:
023112
|
|
|
Publication |
Aug 2002.
|
Description |
61-76
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3 |
ID:
056500
|
|
|
4 |
ID:
055302
|
|
|
Publication |
2002.
|
Summary/Abstract |
This article examines the competition between India and China in software development and in the Information Technology (IT) market. Although China leads India in overall IT development, India still dominates the software export sector. In this context, China has made it clear that it intends to overtake India in software development. Set against the broader context of economic reforms, the paper will use a comparative framework to examine various factors that influenced the development of the software industry in China and India. It will make a case for cooperation that will result in a win-win situation for both countries.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5 |
ID:
056499
|
|
|
6 |
ID:
022744
|
|
|
Publication |
Autumn 2002.
|
Description |
71-82
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7 |
ID:
056479
|
|
|
8 |
ID:
058312
|
|
|
9 |
ID:
018842
|
|
|
Publication |
2001.
|
Description |
162-169
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10 |
ID:
018451
|
|
|
Publication |
Oct-Dec 2000.
|
Description |
123-127
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11 |
ID:
047096
|
|
|
Publication |
New Delhi, Knowledge world, 2001.
|
Description |
xli, 301p.
|
Standard Number |
8187966017
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Copies: C:2/I:0,R:0,Q:0
Circulation
Accession# | Call# | Current Location | Status | Policy | Location |
044311 | 303.48330954/JOS 044311 | Main | On Shelf | General | |
044312 | 303.48330954/JOS 044312 | Main | On Shelf | General | |
|
|
|
|
12 |
ID:
056498
|
|
|
13 |
ID:
055943
|
|
|
14 |
ID:
058212
|
|
|
15 |
ID:
058533
|
|
|
16 |
ID:
058282
|
|
|
17 |
ID:
020263
|
|
|
Publication |
July-Sept 2001.
|
Description |
392-405
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18 |
ID:
019847
|
|
|
Publication |
April-June 2001.
|
Description |
211-232
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
19 |
ID:
060594
|
|
|
20 |
ID:
022619
|
|
|
Publication |
April 2002.
|
Description |
61-90
|
Summary/Abstract |
This article analyzes Indian public policy on telecommunications. India's telecommunications sector is still mostly state-run, despite a decade-long process of reforms that ended the state monopoly, allowed private entry and introduced independent regulation. The result has been inefficiency and underinvestment. Why has reform not delivered? The answers lie in the choices made by policymakers on reforming the existing institutions that provided telecommunications products and services and what was done to enable new institutions (especially from the private sector) to be created - in particular, the degree of competition allowed and the rules that govern both old and new institutions.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|