|
|
|
Sort Order |
|
|
|
Items / Page
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Srl | Item |
| 1 |
ID:
078866
|
|
|
|
|
| Publication |
2007.
|
| Summary/Abstract |
The region, Central Asia, and the regional organisation, SCO, were of significance for China, India and Russia with respect to dealing with threats to security posed by non-state actors such as terrorists and drug-traffickers. The three could also cooperate with regard to energy resources, transport and investment in the region. However, competition could not be ruled out and hence it was necessary to structure their interaction in terms of 'cooperative competition' and well-coordinated trilateral interaction, for example, by each agreeing to specialise in a particular sphere or sector.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 2 |
ID:
078859
|
|
|
|
|
| Publication |
2007.
|
| Summary/Abstract |
At different stages of their history, leaders of China, India and Russia, the most prominent constituents of the Eurasian landmass and home to one-third of the human population of the world, have formulated the aim of breaking out of the 'backward' state of their respective countries as a major goal of their movements, their strategies and their policies. Almost in all cases, such a state of backwardness has been perceived in relation to the 'advanced' Western countries, and more specifically to the industrialised countries of Europe and North America. All three countries have been caught several times in recent centuries in the cunning passages of history. All of them now see light at the end of the labyrinthine tunnel. A recognition of their common destinies as homes of human beings with complicated histories and of the need for cooperation to protect themselves against the forces of evil, in the shape of market fundamentalism, religious fanaticism and super-hegemonic imperialism can help them to guard themselves against being caught again in Minotaur's lair
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 3 |
ID:
078864
|
|
|
|
|
| Publication |
2007.
|
| Summary/Abstract |
There are linkages between the environment and economic development. International cooperation is essential for preserving the environment. China, India and Russia each consist of a large population, a vast territory and a fast growing economy. They could work together to strengthen coordination in the field of environmental protection; establish institutional mechanisms for trilateral cooperation; and start a dialogue, share experiences and jointly train personnel on environment protection. China and Russia could work together in preventing pollution in their border river basin. Important areas for cooperation between China and India would be in research and development of technology for utilising environmentally friendly wind, bio-mass and solar energy, and in improving the energy utilisation ratio.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 4 |
ID:
078860
|
|
|
|
|
| Publication |
2007.
|
| Summary/Abstract |
In discussing economic issues during the last two meetings of the trilateral academic China-India-Russia dialogue, some scholars raised the necessity of strengthening coordination of the Sino-Indian positions within the WTO framework. Russia is expected to complete bilateral negotiations for WTO accession by the end of 2007, entailing the need to understand WTO rules for trade. Currently, the issue raising the greatest concern within WTO is the collapse of the five-year long Doha Round negotiations and the uncertainty regarding their resumption. With these issues in mind, this article concerns itself with how China, India, and Russia can further deepen economic cooperation in the context of the Doha Round stalemate.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 5 |
ID:
078863
|
|
|
|
|
| Publication |
2007.
|
| Summary/Abstract |
Through the second half of the twentieth century, the environment has deteriorated throughout the planet in general as well as in China, India and Russia in particular. Russian-Indian cooperation in the ecological sphere works through exchange of experience in resolution of various ecological problems. But it would be very different from the need for Russia and China to make joint efforts to overcome the problems arising in the vast and ecologically unfavourable area across the Russia-China border, particularly with regard to the Amur river basin
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 6 |
ID:
078861
|
|
|
|
|
| Publication |
2007.
|
| Summary/Abstract |
The article examines the performance of the Chinese, Indian and Russian economies in the context of the world economy. The major features of the world economy has been (i) its slowing down for all regions except Asia since the oil price shocks of 1973-74, (ii) the increasing integration of the different economies as barriers to trade have been reduced, and (iii) increasing importance of private capital flows. While the Russian economy, or that of the erstwhile Soviet Union, was not affected by the oil price shocks other economies apart from the Asian economies were. A major aspect of this effect is the decreasing productivity of capital. An important challenge is how the international economic system can be managed to return the world economy to higher rates of growth. In particular, how can growth rates in the developing world be raised? Trade liberalization must assist in this endeavor. Furthermore, increasing private capital flows have created the potential for destabilizing capital movements. It has been recognized that changes must be made in the international financial system. In this article we examine the interests of China, India and Russia in the international economic system.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 7 |
ID:
078870
|
|
|
|
|
| Publication |
2007.
|
| Summary/Abstract |
The article seeks to help find common ground, in the Trilateral context, on the approach to current developments relating to North Korea as well as on long-term policy regarding the Koreas. We are aware of the close and long-established interaction between the Koreas, China and Russia, and the particular interests of the latter two in the Korean peninsula. For India, this is by no means a remote area but indeed an integral part of our growing engagement with East and Northeast Asia. The well documented record of trafficking in nuclear weapons and missile technology between North Korea and our immediate South Asian neighbourhood is a matter of utmost concern. The justified anxiety about the proliferation related implications of North Korea's nuclear weapon and missile activity should reinforce purposeful rethinking on the correct ways and means of ensuring non-proliferation and eventual global nuclear disarmament. Also relevant is the larger picture involving North Korea's internal dynamic and development, its reform programme, incipient globalisation, trends in North Korea's relations with Japan and South Korea, especially inter-Korea exchanges and the long term agenda of reunification, and the prospects for the six-party talks and the role of the US.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 8 |
ID:
078869
|
|
|
|
|
| Publication |
2007.
|
| Summary/Abstract |
As a regional organisation the SCO is increasingly embracing both Central and South Asia, and it will become an important platform for promoting the building of a harmonious region. New developments in the security situations of West Asia and Northeast Asia have far-reaching implications for international security dynamics. China, India and Russia should uphold multilateralism and prevail upon the United Nations to play the leading role in safeguarding peace and security. Complicated by terrorism and other non-traditional security threats, the current international security order is challenged as many old assumptions of regional orders, security thinking, planning and international security regimes are losing their relevance
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 9 |
ID:
078867
|
|
|
|
|
| Publication |
2007.
|
| Summary/Abstract |
There are three schools of thought among Russian scholars on China and its SCO policy. The first group, referred to as Optimists or Enthusiasts, think that the world needs a strong Russia as a stabilising factor in international affairs. The second group, referred to as Alarmists, assert that there is growing discord between a weak Russia and a fast growing China and that conflict between them is inevitable. Emphasising that China is stronger than Russia for the first time in two centuries, they argue that China's SCO policy is designed to buy time and strengthen itself with Russian assistance within the organisation till it becomes a super power. The third group, referred to as Realists are of the view that China is both a prospective partner and a potential adversary for Russia, and that this should be taken into account while shaping Moscow's SCO policy as well as in judging China's SCO policy
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 10 |
ID:
078865
|
|
|
|
|
| Publication |
2007.
|
| Summary/Abstract |
Traditionally scientists have looked at agriculture merely as a production system. It is only in recent times when issues of sustainability have been regularly cropping up, that there is a paradigm shift. There is now an attempt to look at agriculture also as an ecological system. India and China are two large rapidly industrializing countries that have a large and heterogeneous population load to carry. India and China are also very ancient agricultural countries with a long and rich tradition of natural resource conservation linked sustainable management of agriculture. There is a need for linking cultural diversity with biological diversity, so rich in the India-China context, as the basis for sustainable management of natural resources, leading towards human wellbeing, and thus contributing towards human security
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 11 |
ID:
078862
|
|
|
|
|
| Publication |
2007.
|
| Summary/Abstract |
As growing economic ties necessitates the development of transport routes in Asia, the latter process would in turn facilitate the former one. New transport routes could serve as a strong impulse for the development of adjacent territories. Cooperation between China, India and Russia in this sector could take the form of joint road and pipeline construction, investment projects and measures to safeguard the security of communications.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 12 |
ID:
078868
|
|
|
|
|
| Publication |
2007.
|
| Summary/Abstract |
Given the centrality of West Asia, and the dependence of the world on its energy resources, hegemonic perceptions of security in the region need to give way to cooperative ones. Some states of the Persian Gulf littoral have articulated the need to involve Asian countries like China and India in future security arrangements. The role of non-state actors-Hizbollah in Lebanon, Hamas in Palestine, and various resistance groups in Iraq-would make inter-state arrangements more complex. Procrustean formulae (that is to say attempts to fit the region into preconceived formulae in order to solve its problems) have failed to achieve results; hence there is a need to shape formulae to fit the region and its problems
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|