Query Result Set
SLIM21 Home
Advanced Search
My Info
Browse
Arrivals
Expected
Reference Items
Journal List
Proposals
Media List
Rules
ActiveUsers:376
Hits:19886935
Show My Basket
Contact Us
IDSA Web Site
Ask Us
Today's News
Help
Topics
Tutorial
Advanced search
Hide Options
Sort Order
Natural
Author / Creator, Title
Title
Item Type, Author / Creator, Title
Item Type, Title
Subject, Item Type, Author / Creator, Title
Item Type, Subject, Author / Creator, Title
Publication Date, Title
Items / Page
5
10
15
20
Modern View
TAMAS, PETER A
(2)
answer(s).
Srl
Item
1
ID:
116862
Is the non-unitary subject a plausible and productive way to un
/ Tamas, Peter A; Sato, Chizu
Tamas, Peter A
Journal Article
0 Rating(s) & 0 Review(s)
Publication
2012.
Summary/Abstract
Development bureaucrats are the human instruments of the policies that mobilise funds, create organisations and underwrite interventions. For their home audiences development organisations need to present bureaucrats who are reliable instruments. In the field these same organisations need staff who can do what makes sense. This arrangement works until what makes sense in head office does not work in the field. At that point staff have to 'marry off' these two worlds. How these staff are understood shapes both how they can be approached by locals and how they should be supported by their organisations. This paper draws on research done in a donor organisation headquarters, in a military unit tasked with conducting development activities and at a field-level donor mission in a failed state. It explores the relevance, methods to research, the plausibility and the productivity of understanding the development bureaucrats who do this 'marrying off' as non-unitary subjects.
Key Words
Understand Development Bureaucrats
;
Human Instruments
;
Non - Unitary Subject
Links
'Full Text'
In Basket
Export
2
ID:
078936
Spoken moments of a pernicious discourse? Querying Foucauldian
/ Tamas, Peter A
Tamas, Peter A
Journal Article
0 Rating(s) & 0 Review(s)
Publication
2007.
Summary/Abstract
Critics influenced by Foucault understand development professionals to be determined by the official knowledge produced within their discourse to actions that harm their putative beneficiaries. This discourages these authors from looking more closely at development professionals and limits their value as allies for the social movements they champion. Through a series of interviews this paper finds that development professionals have a range of understandings of their knowledge, that each suggests distinct ranges of permissible action and that these offer terrains for the formation of alliances that are not anticipated by Foucauldian critics. It also finds that the practices required to exploit these opportunities perversely reinforce the status of official knowledge and that this status may ultimately constrain development in ways that are neither anticipated by Foucauldian critics nor operationally acceptable.
Key Words
Globalization
;
Development
;
International Development
In Basket
Export