Query Result Set
Skip Navigation Links
   ActiveUsers:376Hits:19886935Skip Navigation Links
Show My Basket
Contact Us
IDSA Web Site
Ask Us
Today's News
HelpExpand Help
Advanced search

  Hide Options
Sort Order Items / Page
TAMAS, PETER A (2) answer(s).
 
SrlItem
1
ID:   116862


Is the non-unitary subject a plausible and productive way to un / Tamas, Peter A; Sato, Chizu   Journal Article
Tamas, Peter A Journal Article
0 Rating(s) & 0 Review(s)
Publication 2012.
Summary/Abstract Development bureaucrats are the human instruments of the policies that mobilise funds, create organisations and underwrite interventions. For their home audiences development organisations need to present bureaucrats who are reliable instruments. In the field these same organisations need staff who can do what makes sense. This arrangement works until what makes sense in head office does not work in the field. At that point staff have to 'marry off' these two worlds. How these staff are understood shapes both how they can be approached by locals and how they should be supported by their organisations. This paper draws on research done in a donor organisation headquarters, in a military unit tasked with conducting development activities and at a field-level donor mission in a failed state. It explores the relevance, methods to research, the plausibility and the productivity of understanding the development bureaucrats who do this 'marrying off' as non-unitary subjects.
        Export Export
2
ID:   078936


Spoken moments of a pernicious discourse? Querying Foucauldian / Tamas, Peter A   Journal Article
Tamas, Peter A Journal Article
0 Rating(s) & 0 Review(s)
Publication 2007.
Summary/Abstract Critics influenced by Foucault understand development professionals to be determined by the official knowledge produced within their discourse to actions that harm their putative beneficiaries. This discourages these authors from looking more closely at development professionals and limits their value as allies for the social movements they champion. Through a series of interviews this paper finds that development professionals have a range of understandings of their knowledge, that each suggests distinct ranges of permissible action and that these offer terrains for the formation of alliances that are not anticipated by Foucauldian critics. It also finds that the practices required to exploit these opportunities perversely reinforce the status of official knowledge and that this status may ultimately constrain development in ways that are neither anticipated by Foucauldian critics nor operationally acceptable.
        Export Export