| Srl | Item |
| 1 |
ID:
005916
|
|
|
|
|
| Publication |
Singapore, John Wiley & Sons, 1995.
|
| Description |
xvii, 497p.
|
| Standard Number |
0471131148
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Copies: C:1/I:0,R:0,Q:0
Circulation
| Accession# | Call# | Current Location | Status | Policy | Location |
| 037409 | 320.951/LAM 037409 | Main | On Shelf | General | |
|
|
|
|
| 2 |
ID:
100349
|
|
|
|
|
| Publication |
2010.
|
| Summary/Abstract |
The issue of social networks is central to scholars' examinations of China's economic reform and its transitional society. This article presents an effort to examine the impact of the property rights reform on the evolution of entrepreneurs' social networks in the context of rural China. This study proposes three different patterns of social networks: in-group networks, official-centered networks, and market-oriented networks; and examines how the significance of different network patterns has evolved under the context of institutional change. By using data collected in Wuxi city, Jiangsu province, China, this article attempts to explore four significant questions. Do social networks still matter? How is the significance of different patterns of social networks changing? Why could this happen? In which fields do social networks still matter?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 3 |
ID:
078385
|
|
|
|
|
| Publication |
Oxford, Peter Lang, 2007.
|
| Description |
xiii, 286p.
|
| Standard Number |
9783039110308
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Copies: C:1/I:0,R:0,Q:0
Circulation
| Accession# | Call# | Current Location | Status | Policy | Location |
| 052540 | 338.90951/LAM 052540 | Main | On Shelf | General | |
|
|
|
|
| 4 |
ID:
095304
|
|
|
|
|
| Summary/Abstract |
Using nationally representative household survey data and a revealing statistical method, this article investigates the redistributive nature of the Chinese social benefit system within urban and rural areas respectively and in the national context. Like many other dimensions of Chinese society, the redistributive nature of social benefits appeared to be a two-sided story: urban social benefits were much more generous and predominantly progressive, while rural social benefits were minimal and consistently regressive. The national social benefit system was redistributed regressively, but the extent of its regressivity decreased over time, suggesting an equity-oriented policy direction echoed by several recent government initiatives to support rural residents, migrants and the urban poor. The outcomes of these initiatives, especially their redistributive effects, require close observation and await evaluation.
Qin Gao is an assistant professor at Fordham University in New York City. Her current research focuses on the Chinese social benefit system in transition and its impact on poverty, income inequality, and family economic and subjective well-being and cross-national comparative social policy analysis among China, South Korea and Vietnam.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|