Query Result Set
SLIM21 Home
Advanced Search
My Info
Browse
Arrivals
Expected
Reference Items
Journal List
Proposals
Media List
Rules
ActiveUsers:1425
Hits:24765507
Show My Basket
Contact Us
IDSA Web Site
Ask Us
Today's News
Help
Topics
Tutorial
Advanced search
Hide Options
Sort Order
Natural
Author / Creator, Title
Title
Item Type, Author / Creator, Title
Item Type, Title
Subject, Item Type, Author / Creator, Title
Item Type, Subject, Author / Creator, Title
Publication Date, Title
Items / Page
5
10
15
20
Modern View
NASU, HITOSHI
(2)
answer(s).
Srl
Item
1
ID:
106775
Operationalizing the responsibility to protect in the context o
/ Nasu, Hitoshi
Nasu, Hitoshi
Journal Article
0 Rating(s) & 0 Review(s)
Publication
2011.
Summary/Abstract
This article examines how operationalizing the 'responsibility to protect' (R2P) concept may assist in defining the scope of civilian protection mandates for peacekeepers, which are ambiguously restricted by three caveats - 'imminent threat of physical violence', 'area of deployment' and 'capabilities'. It is argued that by restrictively interpreting civilian protection mandates in the light of R2P the limited resources of peacekeeping troops would be more effectively utilized to protect civilians from mass atrocity crimes. Greater investment would be required to build capacity among the more creative and specially trained units to protect civilians from physical violence, in addition to greater coordination between the military and those specially trained units.
Key Words
UN Peacekeepers
;
Civilian Protection
;
United Nations
Links
'Full Text'
In Basket
Export
2
ID:
079773
Responsibility to react? lessons from the security council's re
/ Nasu, Hitoshi
Nasu, Hitoshi
Journal Article
0 Rating(s) & 0 Review(s)
Publication
2007.
Summary/Abstract
The Security Council's failure to react when Israel initiated its third large-scale military incursion into southern Lebanon in July 2006 stands in contrast to the overall reform agenda towards a responsive and accountable Security Council. While the idea of 'responsibility to protect' increasingly gains recognition, the delay in reacting to this event demonstrated a setback contrary to legitimate expectations expressed by member states. This article uncovers the extent to which the international community has come to recognize the legal significance of the Security Council's responsibility under the UN Charter, what legal implications the failure of reaction could entail, and what needs to be reformed to rectify the 'responsibility deficit disorder' of the Security Council. It is argued that the Security Council's responsibility under Art. 24(1) carries growing legal significance, which requires reform of the 'attitude' and 'culture' of the Security Council towards conflict management by mainstreaming peacekeeping operations in its security policy
Key Words
Peacekeeping
;
Middle East
;
Security Policy
;
United Nations
In Basket
Export