Query Result Set
Skip Navigation Links
   ActiveUsers:567Hits:20305936Skip Navigation Links
Show My Basket
Contact Us
IDSA Web Site
Ask Us
Today's News
HelpExpand Help
Advanced search

  Hide Options
Sort Order Items / Page
STEPHEN J. CIMBALA (1) answer(s).
 
SrlItem
1
ID:   080337


Going ballistic over missile defenses: what matters and why / Stephen J. Cimbala   Journal Article
Stephen J. Cimbala Journal Article
0 Rating(s) & 0 Review(s)
Publication 2007.
Summary/Abstract Missile defenses have become a source of controversy between the United States and Russia, out of proportion to their technological capabilities and in negligence of strategic and political realities. Cooler heads should prevail. U.S. or other national missile defenses will not abolish mutual deterrence based on assured retaliation. In addition, whether defenses support or undermine deterrence is a question of political intent, not of technology determinism. U.S. missile defenses deployed in Europe, for example, might be provocateurs of Russian distrust or they might be instruments of collaborative research and development under a regime of cooperative security.
        Export Export