Query Result Set
Skip Navigation Links
   ActiveUsers:444Hits:20449008Skip Navigation Links
Show My Basket
Contact Us
IDSA Web Site
Ask Us
Today's News
HelpExpand Help
Advanced search

  Hide Options
Sort Order Items / Page
BELOW, AMY (2) answer(s).
 
SrlItem
1
ID:   125788


Obstacles in energy security: an analysis of congressional and presidential framing in the United States / Below, Amy   Journal Article
Below, Amy Journal Article
0 Rating(s) & 0 Review(s)
Publication 2013.
Summary/Abstract Despite decades of policymaking, the U.S. has only recently made significant strides in becoming a more energy secure nation. With a focus on the executive and legislative branches, this paper investigates two possible political obstacles to achieve this policy goal. The first question it asks is whether or not the two branches have been defining energy security in the same way. As the concept itself has no universal definition, it is possible that the branches have been focusing on different aspects of the term. Results from a content analysis of presidential speeches and congressional hearings suggest that no such division has occurred. The subsequent question asks whether or not the two branches, in tandem, are providing the foundation for sound policy. Results suggest that Congress and presidents have defined and discussed energy security in a generally balanced, comprehensive and internally non-conflictual way. What policy emerges from these discussions should be the subject of future research.
Key Words Energy Security  United States  Policy Framing 
        Export Export
2
ID:   081308


U.S. presidential decisions on ozone depletion and climate chan: a foreign policy analysis / Below, Amy   Journal Article
Below, Amy Journal Article
0 Rating(s) & 0 Review(s)
Publication 2008.
Summary/Abstract The overarching question this paper addresses is whether and, if so, to what extent can existing IR theories commonly associated with high politics decision making be applied to low politics issue areas, specifically international environmental policy. The paper serves to test poliheuristic theory against two case studies, The Montreal Protocol and The Kyoto Protocol, to assess its ability to explain the decision-making processes of four United States presidents. The paper concludes that poliheuristic theory adequately explains the presidents' behavior in virtually all cases. It is especially effective in explaining the first phase of the decision-making process. The paper also suggests in the conclusion that a president's "environmentalness" may affect his decision-making behavior in the first phase.
        Export Export