Query Result Set
Skip Navigation Links
   ActiveUsers:782Hits:19965978Skip Navigation Links
Show My Basket
Contact Us
IDSA Web Site
Ask Us
Today's News
HelpExpand Help
Advanced search

  Hide Options
Sort Order Items / Page
PARULEKAR, DATTESH D (3) answer(s).
 
SrlItem
1
ID:   081693


Asia, the Indian Ocean and Latin America / Shivkumar, V; Parulekar, Dattesh D   Journal Article
Shivkumar, V Journal Article
0 Rating(s) & 0 Review(s)
Publication 2008.
Key Words Indian Ocean  Latin America 
        Export Export
2
ID:   108215


Russia in Latin America: endearing, but enduring? / Parulekar, Dattesh D   Journal Article
Parulekar, Dattesh D Journal Article
0 Rating(s) & 0 Review(s)
Publication 2011.
        Export Export
3
ID:   192909


Scoping an India-Japan Cooperative Framework for Africa: the ‘AAGC’ and Beyond / Parulekar, Dattesh D   Journal Article
Parulekar, Dattesh D Journal Article
0 Rating(s) & 0 Review(s)
Summary/Abstract The India-Japan mutuality has been acquiring steady salience through the 21st century, exuded in no small measure in the telegenic flourish of the nomenclatures, connoting engagement.1 Since late Prime Minister Abe Shinzo’s clairvoyant averment of the ‘Confluence-of-the-Two-Seas’ schema in 2007,2 through to incumbent Prime Minister Kishida Fumio’s recent seminal unveiling of the Indo-Pacific Vision, the purposeful choice of India as a venue for such defining articulations, is emblematic of Tokyo’s convictions about New Delhi as the veritable ‘indispensable partner’ across the trans-regional straddle, and in its extremities.3 However, whilst iconic infrastructure-built projects embody resplendent mutual equations, the visage of India-Japan cooperation and convergence across third countries, and extant sub-regions, remains heady in promise and teeming with possibilities; yet, in reality, is only incremental, and substantively underwhelming in performance. This ‘expectationsoutcomes’ disconnect is all the more galling when contextualised in both the protagonists’ deeply shared apprehensions over the coercive and predatory dimensions of Chinese strategic ascendancy. Both countries have espoused the need for a plural rules-based maritime order, and the chaperoning of a mercantilist and infrastructure development edifice which is anchored-in political transparency, financial rectitude, social consultation, and ecologically congruent actions, in the Indo-Pacific.4
        Export Export