Query Result Set
Skip Navigation Links
   ActiveUsers:1506Hits:19754380Skip Navigation Links
Show My Basket
Contact Us
IDSA Web Site
Ask Us
Today's News
HelpExpand Help
Advanced search

  Hide Options
Sort Order Items / Page
WEAVER, MICHAEL E (2) answer(s).
 
SrlItem
1
ID:   081902


International cooperation and bureaucratic in-fighting / Weaver, Michael E   Journal Article
Weaver, Michael E Journal Article
0 Rating(s) & 0 Review(s)
Publication 2008.
Summary/Abstract The pursuit of intelligence on the German economy by the United States Army Air Corps prior to 1942 revealed great gaps in US knowledge of the German economy. This encouraged joint efforts with British Intelligence. The Air Corps exploited sources creatively to find German industrial targets. Its specialized needs persuaded it to try to establish an Air Corps intelligence gathering section. The Air Corps clashed with the Army over access to economic data. Its need for economic intelligence merged with its political goal of making strategic bombing its primary mission. Intelligence gathering efforts ultimately translated into the creation of air warfare strategy
Key Words Intelligence  Economy  Germany 
        Export Export
2
ID:   132011


Relationship between diplomacy and military force: an example from the Cuban missile crisis / Weaver, Michael E   Journal Article
Weaver, Michael E Journal Article
0 Rating(s) & 0 Review(s)
Publication 2014.
Summary/Abstract Diplomacy and military force mutually support each other as instruments of national policy, functioning better in concert rather than as separate entities. The Cuban Missile Crisis is a useful case study of policymakers utilizing force and diplomacy synergistically. State Department efforts prior to the crisis paved the way for a unified front with Latin American neighbors against the emplacement of Soviet missiles in Cuba. With a backdrop of nuclear threats supporting the more usable capabilities of conventional air strikes, invasion forces, and blockading ships, the American threat of force made a negotiated settlement attractive to the leadership of the Soviet Union. The risks and political damage commensurate with the use of force encouraged the Kennedy administration to pursue a diplomatic solution. Military leaders tended to not consider the political effects of the use of force. President Kennedy understood the interrelationships between force and diplomacy, as did State Department leaders.
        Export Export