Query Result Set
SLIM21 Home
Advanced Search
My Info
Browse
Arrivals
Expected
Reference Items
Journal List
Proposals
Media List
Rules
ActiveUsers:1367
Hits:18748213
Show My Basket
Contact Us
IDSA Web Site
Ask Us
Today's News
Help
Topics
Tutorial
Advanced search
Hide Options
Sort Order
Natural
Author / Creator, Title
Title
Item Type, Author / Creator, Title
Item Type, Title
Subject, Item Type, Author / Creator, Title
Item Type, Subject, Author / Creator, Title
Publication Date, Title
Items / Page
5
10
15
20
Modern View
COCKERHAM, GEOFFREY B
(2)
answer(s).
Srl
Item
1
ID:
082135
Delegation of dispute settlement authority to conventional inte
/ Cockerham, Geoffrey B
Cockerham, Geoffrey B
Journal Article
0 Rating(s) & 0 Review(s)
Publication
2008.
Summary/Abstract
The issue of dispute settlement is problematic in the international system because it may conflict with sovereignty. States may find, however, that in order to facilitate cooperation, they should delegate some authority to resolve disputes to a third party. This article seeks to provide a measure for dispute settlement authority and some explanation for the delegation aspect of international cooperation by examining why states agree to grant dispute settlement authority to a particular kind of institutional arrangement, conventional international governmental organizations (IGOs). The analysis reveals that states tend to enter into IGO agreements with a higher degree of dispute settlement authority when members have a greater incentive to defect due either to the large number of other parties to the agreement, or due to greater cooperative demands as provided by the agreement
Key Words
Delegation
;
International Governmental Organizations
;
Dispute Settlement
;
Institutional Design
In Basket
Export
2
ID:
095475
Regional integration in ASEAN: institutional design and the ASEAN way
/ Cockerham, Geoffrey B
Cockerham, Geoffrey B
Journal Article
0 Rating(s) & 0 Review(s)
Publication
2010.
Summary/Abstract
This paper investigates regional integration in the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN) by analyzing the agreements developed within the ASEAN framework since its founding in 1967. This examination reveals that, although integration in ASEAN is certainly influenced by norms and values, the integration process can be best understood by intergovernmentalism. While many agreements have been developed within the ASEAN framework and have become more legalistic in nature, they tend to mostly be in functional areas and exhibit low levels of transparency and delegation. The design of ASEAN is indicative of an overriding concern for state sovereignty as a key strategic interest for member states.
Key Words
ASEAN
;
Rationalism
;
International Agreements
;
Norms
;
Institutional Design
;
Intergovernmentalism
In Basket
Export