|
|
|
Sort Order |
|
|
|
Items / Page
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Srl | Item |
| 1 |
ID:
086348
|
|
|
|
|
| Publication |
2009.
|
| Summary/Abstract |
East Asian democracies are in distress. From Bangkok to Manila to Taipei to Seoul to Ulaanbaatar, democratically elected governments in the last few years have suffered inconclusive or disputed electoral outcomes, political strife, partisan gridlock, and recurring political scandals. In 2006-2007, frustrated citizens in Manila and Taipei lost confidence in democratic procedures to the point where they tried to bring down incumbent leaders through extraconstitutional demonstrations, while a crippling political crisis in Thailand in 2006 triggered a military coup.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 2 |
ID:
182595
|
|
|
|
|
| Summary/Abstract |
The Biden Administration has accepted the Trump Administration’s definition of China as a ‘strategic competitor’, and has retained Trump’s tariffs, the ‘Quad’, and the upgrade in Taiwan’s protocol status. But Biden’s China policy is different from Trump’s in being truly strategic. The key elements of that strategy are focused on improving the United States’ competitiveness domestically and in international affairs; cooperation with allies and partners; an emphasis on human rights; partial decoupling of economic and technology relationships; and a search for some areas of cooperation with China. Success for the Biden strategy would consist neither of bottling up China in its current global power position nor in achieving a negotiated condominium in Asia. The Biden Administration would succeed if the United States can maintain its alliance system, keep a robust military presence in East Asia and prevent the forcible integration of Taiwan into China while avoiding major war. Several features of the China challenge make it reasonable to hope that such success is possible.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 3 |
ID:
140136
|
|
|
|
|
| Publication |
New York, Columbia University Press, 1990.
|
| Description |
x, 242p.hbk
|
| Series |
Studies of the East Asian Institute
|
| Standard Number |
0231072848
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Copies: C:1/I:0,R:0,Q:0
Circulation
| Accession# | Call# | Current Location | Status | Policy | Location |
| 032663 | 951.05/NAT 032663 | Main | On Shelf | General | |
|
|
|
|
| 4 |
ID:
116620
|
|
|
|
|
| Publication |
2012.
|
| Summary/Abstract |
Despite the dramatic growth of China's military power since the early 1990s, the Chinese People's Liberation Army (PLA), as all branches of China's armed forces are collectively known, remains overstretched as it seeks to address the wide range of missions it is called upon to perform. "China threat" theorists worry that the PLA poses a more significant challenge to the United States and China's neighbors than it did twenty years ago, and they are right. Yet the Chinese military is far from able to successfully carry out all its most pressing military tasks within China's borders and in its immediate neighborhood, and has only begun to project significant force beyond the Asia-Pacific.1 The real test for the PLA will be how adept it proves to be at bringing together new weapon systems, equipment, and formations in response to one or more serious instances of wartime or peacetime contingencies-a broad set of requirements the Chinese have dubbed "Diversified Military Tasks."2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 5 |
ID:
120271
|
|
|
|
|
| Publication |
New York, Columbia University Press, 2012.
|
| Description |
xxiii,406p.hbk
|
| Standard Number |
9780231140508
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Copies: C:1/I:0,R:0,Q:0
Circulation
| Accession# | Call# | Current Location | Status | Policy | Location |
| 057295 | 355.033551/NAT 057295 | Main | On Shelf | General | |
|
|
|
|
| 6 |
ID:
159136
|
|
|
|
|
| Publication |
New York, Columbia University Press, 2012.
|
| Description |
xxiii, 406hbk
|
| Standard Number |
9780231140508
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Copies: C:1/I:0,R:0,Q:0
Circulation
| Accession# | Call# | Current Location | Status | Policy | Location |
| 059387 | 355.033551/NAT 059387 | Main | On Shelf | General | |
|
|
|
|
| 7 |
ID:
051739
|
|
|
|
|
| Publication |
New York, Columbia Universty Press, 1997.
|
| Description |
xiv, 313p.
|
| Standard Number |
0231110235
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Copies: C:1/I:0,R:0,Q:0
Circulation
| Accession# | Call# | Current Location | Status | Policy | Location |
| 042351 | 320.951/NAT 042351 | Main | On Shelf | General | |
|
|
|
|
| 8 |
ID:
050297
|
|
|
|
|
| Publication |
Armonk, M. E. Sharpe, 2003.
|
| Description |
xxxiii, 353p.
|
| Series |
International relations in constructed world
|
| Standard Number |
0765611376
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Copies: C:1/I:0,R:0,Q:0
Circulation
| Accession# | Call# | Current Location | Status | Policy | Location |
| 047541 | 323/MON 047541 | Main | On Shelf | General | |
|
|
|
|
| 9 |
ID:
146894
|
|
|
|
|
| Summary/Abstract |
The hard logic of China’s geostrategic vulnerability drives Chinese foreign policy. Neither nationalism, power struggles nor interest group politics constrain the elite’s foreign policy decisions. The good news for India is that China’s goals are relatively easy to understand. The bad news is that China seeks more influence in South Asia.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 10 |
ID:
148138
|
|
|
|
|
| Summary/Abstract |
ANDREW J. NATHAN and ANDREW SCOBELL analyze the gains and losses to Chinese security from the country’s embrace of globalization in the post-Mao period. They argue that while China has grown richer and more influential, it has also been penetrated by global forces that it does not control and become enmeshed in complex relationships of interdependence.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 11 |
ID:
123102
|
|
|
|
|
| Publication |
2013.
|
| Summary/Abstract |
Andrew J. Nathan AND Andrew Scobell analyze the gains and losses to Chinese security from the country's embrace of globalization in the post-Mao period. They argue that while China has grown richer and more influential, it has also been penetrated by global forces that it does not control and enmeshed in complex relationships of interdependence.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 12 |
ID:
114118
|
|
|
|
|
| Publication |
2012.
|
| Summary/Abstract |
United States worries about China's rise, but Washington rarely considers how the world looks through Beijing's eyes. Even when U.S. officials speak sweetly and softly, their Chinese counterparts hear sugarcoated threats and focus on the big stick in the background. America should not shrink from setting out its expectations of Asia's rising superpower -- but it should do so calmly, coolly, and professionally.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 13 |
ID:
083395
|
|
|
| 14 |
ID:
186133
|
|
|
|
|
| Summary/Abstract |
The phrase ‘work to build a community with a shared future for mankind’ became the guiding slogan of Chinese foreign policy in 2017. Beneath its smooth surface, the concept contains several layers of complex and sometimes contradictory meanings. Among other things, it seeks to position China both as one among many developing countries, treating all as equals, and as a major world leader that exerts influence over other states and the international system. The concept is thus at once both egalitarian and hierarchical. Along with the core concept, Chinese foreign policy articulates niche discourses on ethno-cultural identity, Marxism, and human rights that are targeted at special audiences. The writings of leading Chinese international-relations intellectuals tend to reveal a more emphatically hierarchical view of the international system, with China at the top, than is explicit in China’s official rhetoric. Xi’s international message has been promoted energetically by domestic media and promoted tirelessly on the international stage, with adaptations appropriate to diverse audiences. The Chinese message has met with a mixed reception abroad. China’s rhetoric of cooperation is seen by many in other countries as a cover for self-interested strategic motives.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 15 |
ID:
104873
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|