Query Result Set
Skip Navigation Links
   ActiveUsers:1550Hits:19746442Skip Navigation Links
Show My Basket
Contact Us
IDSA Web Site
Ask Us
Today's News
HelpExpand Help
Advanced search

  Hide Options
Sort Order Items / Page
JOHANSSON, KARL MAGNUS (2) answer(s).
 
SrlItem
1
ID:   083437


Chief executive organization and advisory arrangements for fore: the case of Sweden / Johansson, Karl Magnus   Journal Article
Johansson, Karl Magnus Journal Article
0 Rating(s) & 0 Review(s)
Publication 2008.
Summary/Abstract As prime ministers are drawn into international relations and the foreign policy process, they are in need of advisory structures for foreign affairs in their offices. This article examines the system and the role of foreign affairs advisers to the Prime Minister (PM), the chief executive, in Sweden. The article centres on the organization for foreign affairs, in general terms of institutional and staffing arrangements, and on leader-adviser relationships. As the right hand of the PM, inner circle advisers in foreign affairs have a direct role in overseeing foreign policy on the key issues and do more than just serve in an advisory capacity by being operative in diplomacy and in policy coordination. These advisers can therefore wield influence on policy and the government based on their own expertise and position at the centre of power and at the frontier between the chief executive and the outside world
Key Words Adviser  Chief Executive  Foreign Affairs  Process 
        Export Export
2
ID:   111684


Domestic politics of European Union presidencies: the case of Sweden / Johansson, Karl Magnus; Langdal, Fredrik; Sydow, Goran von   Journal Article
Johansson, Karl Magnus Journal Article
0 Rating(s) & 0 Review(s)
Publication 2012.
Summary/Abstract This article aims to start filling a gap in contemporary research on the rotating EU presidencies. In particular, the article pays attention to the role played by domestic factors in the development and fate of EU presidencies. What is the level of conflict between the government and the opposition during EU presidencies? This question is central for us and we address it through an in-depth analysis of one single case, Sweden, through a comparative examination of the role that domestic politics played in the Swedish EU presidencies of 2001 and 2009. In conjunction with our four main explanations for the varying degrees of political conflict during EU presidencies we present four hypotheses that could be advanced in the comparative study of EU presidencies.
Key Words European Union  Sweden  Domestic Politics 
        Export Export