Srl | Item |
1 |
ID:
101029
|
|
|
Publication |
2010.
|
Summary/Abstract |
For the Mumbai attacks of 26 November 2008, the Lashakr-e-Taiba recived training, funding and technical gadgets from the Inter-Service Intelligence (ISI) Pakistan, Middle East countries and United States (US) based companies restively. Fomenting insurgencies and supporting terrorism has been a major component of Pakistan's national strategy, especially against India. Yet t Indian security agencies are still badly trained and poorly equipped. Although, global cooperation is essential in combating international terrorism, the US has adopted selective rather than unified and comprehensive cunterterrorism measures to deal with this scourge in South Asia. It is no secret that the real rulers in Pakistan are the army and the ISI and at times they dwarf the civilian government in decision-making. If extremist forces take over Afghanistan and Pakistan, the world will become significantly less secure. However, international cooperation is not an entitlement and India must firs set its own house in order
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
ID:
103762
|
|
|
3 |
ID:
111013
|
|
|
4 |
ID:
127967
|
|
|
5 |
ID:
118560
|
|
|
6 |
ID:
104500
|
|
|
7 |
ID:
112203
|
|
|
8 |
ID:
108179
|
|
|
9 |
ID:
107383
|
|
|
10 |
ID:
109763
|
|
|
Publication |
2012.
|
Summary/Abstract |
a line-up of events in 2011 that impacted Pakistan's internal security and foreign policy imperatives and overshadowed the crippling economic crunch faced by Pakistan's 180 million people.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11 |
ID:
140092
|
|
|
12 |
ID:
129964
|
|
|
13 |
ID:
150706
|
|
|
14 |
ID:
126294
|
|
|
15 |
ID:
126288
|
|
|
16 |
ID:
100250
|
|
|
17 |
ID:
130794
|
|
|
18 |
ID:
169171
|
|
|
Summary/Abstract |
The meteoric rise of the group calling itself the Islamic State of Iraq and al-Shams (ISIS) has been accompanied by an equally stunning effort to explain from where the organisation emerged, what it is, and why people have been attracted to it. What this article identities, is that despite what appears to be a veneer of intellectual heterogeneity, a deep Orientalism permeates knowledge production about ISIS. Adopting a hybrid-postcolonial lens, the analysis in this article demonstrates that due to a particular Eurocentric-Orientalist schema and disposition, ISIS and its horrendous crimes have been dehistoricised, depoliticised and decontextualised. Additionally, in the process ISIS has been reduced to the Muslim’s fundamentalist dispositions; its innate tendency to incorporate Islamic theological methods, medieval Islamic scholarship, Islamic culture into all forms of politics. Instead, we argue in conclusion, for ISIS to be understood there needs to be a re-reading of the emergence of Islamist violence and terror through a historicised, materialised and politicised methodological framework.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
19 |
ID:
103094
|
|
|
20 |
ID:
104407
|
|
|