|
|
|
Sort Order |
|
|
|
Items / Page
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Srl | Item |
| 1 |
ID:
101078
|
|
|
|
|
| Publication |
2010.
|
| Summary/Abstract |
China has been a nuclear weapon power since October 1964 and India and Pakistan openly since May 1998. Each had its own reason to acquire nuclear weapons-Pakistan to counter India, India to counter both Pakistan and China, and Beijing has always viewed the U.S. and for some time the former Soviet Union as possible nuclear threats. Within Asia, no meaningful dialogue has ever been carried out between China, India and Pakistan on nuclear issues: either on confidence building, doctrine and safety, or on each other's perception of the nuclear threat. Even necessary risk reduction measures have not been attempted. However, some Track Two level dialogues have taken place and this has contributed to some understanding of nuclear policies, strategies and doctrines. In this backdrop, the present study examines the doctrine, strategy and command, and control arrangements prevailing in these countries and recommends the necessary confidence-building measures. These include greater transparency on doctrine, clearer examination of likely strategy and means to universalize "no first use."
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 2 |
ID:
151696
|
|
|
|
|
| Summary/Abstract |
Piracy and threats from non-state actors in the Gulf of Aden have triggered states to cooperate in securing waterways and the sea lines of communication, a development that is fundamentally transforming the region’s maritime security environment. As a result, not only has this region’s strategic importance been reaffirmed, but it has also gained tremendous importance through the presence of several actors, especially China and India. Since 2008, these two countries have been involved in larger global actions against piracy, which has led to increasing contact between their navies and more exposure of their capabilities. Will the broader Indian Ocean region emerge as an area of cooperation or competition between China and India? Drawing on interviews carried out with Chinese and European experts from 2012 to 2015, this article explores the reasons for and instruments of cooperation in antipiracy and the degree to which China uses antipiracy efforts as confidence-building measures.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 3 |
ID:
060616
|
|
|
| 4 |
ID:
006643
|
|
|
|
|
| Publication |
London, Foreign and Commonwealth Office, 1995.
|
| Description |
24p.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Copies: C:1/I:0,R:0,Q:0
Circulation
| Accession# | Call# | Current Location | Status | Policy | Location |
| 038420 | 355.033041/BRI 038420 | Main | On Shelf | General | |
|
|
|
|
| 5 |
ID:
000908
|
|
|
|
|
| Publication |
Aldershot, Ashgate, 1997.
|
| Description |
xx, 357p.
|
| Standard Number |
855219875
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Copies: C:1/I:0,R:0,Q:0
Circulation
| Accession# | Call# | Current Location | Status | Policy | Location |
| 040389 | 341.733/GOL 040389 | Main | On Shelf | General | |
|
|
|
|
| 6 |
ID:
086351
|
|
|
|
|
| Publication |
2008.
|
| Summary/Abstract |
In 1992, for the first time in history, the head of newly independent Central Asian Republic of Kazakhastan, President Nursultan Nazarbayev, stated his vision of future development of Asis at the 47th session of the UN general assembly.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 7 |
ID:
154011
|
|
|
|
|
| Summary/Abstract |
Among a series of Confidence Building Measures that have been put in place over the past one decade to ease the tension between India and Pakistan, the twin Confidence Building Measures of LOC Travel and LOC Trade have stood the test of times and are in operation, al beit, with interruptions during periods of heightened hostility between the two neighbours. The Confidence Building Measure aimed at building trust among the border populations on either side of LOC made a modest beginning and it has forged the reunion of many of the undivided families on either side.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 8 |
ID:
006279
|
|
|
|
|
| Publication |
Kuala Lumpur, ISIS, 1996.
|
| Description |
xvi, 449p.
|
| Standard Number |
9679472191
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Copies: C:1/I:0,R:0,Q:0
Circulation
| Accession# | Call# | Current Location | Status | Policy | Location |
| 037961 | 355.03305/RAM 037961 | Main | On Shelf | General | |
|
|
|
|
| 9 |
ID:
001793
|
|
|
|
|
| Publication |
London, macmillan Press, 2000.
|
| Description |
xii, 398p.
|
| Standard Number |
0333800311
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Copies: C:2/I:0,R:0,Q:0
Circulation
| Accession# | Call# | Current Location | Status | Policy | Location |
| 042805 | 355.03/KRE 042805 | Main | On Shelf | General | |
| 043061 | 355.03/KRE 043061 | Main | On Shelf | General | |
|
|
|
|
| 10 |
ID:
120991
|
|
|
|
|
| Publication |
2013.
|
| Summary/Abstract |
A former British diplomat describes the year which he spent in Georgia with the European Union Monitoring Mission (EUMM) which was set up after the 2008 conflict. Its mission was to provide stabilisation, normalisation and confidence-building. He describes how the EUMM tries to meet these objectives, within the limitations imposed by the Administrative Boundary line (ABL). He also provides a vivid description of every-day life and patrols in heavily armoured vehicles, before assessing the achievements and shortcomings of the EUMM.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 11 |
ID:
061940
|
|
|
|
|
| Publication |
Apr-Jun 2005.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 12 |
ID:
012202
|
|
|
|
|
| Publication |
Aug 197.
|
| Description |
368-71
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 13 |
ID:
185320
|
|
|
| 14 |
ID:
005862
|
|
|
|
|
| Publication |
Washington DC, Henry L. Stimson Center, 1995.
|
| Description |
x, 98p.
|
| Series |
Report No. 20, December 1995
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Copies: C:2/I:0,R:0,Q:0
Circulation
| Accession# | Call# | Current Location | Status | Policy | Location |
| 037327 | 355.03/JUN 037327 | Main | On Shelf | General | |
| 037328 | 355.03/JUN 037328 | Main | On Shelf | General | |
|
|
|
|
| 15 |
ID:
147192
|
|
|
|
|
| Summary/Abstract |
The resumption of trade across the Sino–Central Asian border in 1983 accompanied a gradual thaw in relations between China and the Soviet Union. This paper argues that: (1) Economic liberalization in China (alongside the Soviet Union) created a climate encouraging cross-border exchange. (2) Starting in 1983, improving relations between China and the Soviet Union permitted cross-border exchange in Central Asia; over the subsequent decade, trade volume served as a marker of bilateral relations. (3) Beginning in 1990, efforts by the Chinese leadership to accelerate reform in North-West China, coupled with the independence of Central Asian republics, led to a rapid increase in trade. Hence, the resumption of Sino–Central Asian trade was not grounded in meta-geographical projections – Silk Road, New Silk Road, Silk Road Economic Belt, Eurasian Continental Bridge – but determined by political and economic transitions in the two countries, accompanied by normalizing bilateral relations.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 16 |
ID:
110525
|
|
|
| 17 |
ID:
102338
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|