| Srl | Item |
| 1 |
ID:
068123
|
|
|
| 2 |
ID:
069937
|
|
|
| 3 |
ID:
017439
|
|
|
|
|
| Publication |
June 1994.
|
| Description |
856-862
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 4 |
ID:
056381
|
|
|
| 5 |
ID:
021373
|
|
|
|
|
| Publication |
April 2002.
|
| Description |
56-61
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 6 |
ID:
020013
|
|
|
|
|
| Publication |
Feb 2001.
|
| Description |
61-72
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 7 |
ID:
010387
|
|
|
|
|
| Publication |
Oct-Dec 1995.
|
| Description |
489-500
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 8 |
ID:
061419
|
|
|
|
|
| Publication |
Apr 2005.
|
| Summary/Abstract |
This article aims to study the origins and patterns of China’s involvement in regional multilateral institutions, as well as its characteristics and implications for China’s ASEAN policy in the post-Cold War era. To this end, the study focuses on China’s participation in three ASEAN-initiated and -driven multilateral institutions, namely the ASEAN Regional Forum (ARF), ASEAN-China cooperation, and the ASEAN Plus Three (APT) process. The article shows that China’s perceptions and policies toward multilateral institutions have been going through significant changes, from caution and suspicion to optimism and enthusiasm. Instead of perceiving multilateral institutions as malign arrangements that might be used by other states to challenge China’s national sovereignty and to limit its strategic choices, Beijing now views multilateral institutions as useful diplomatic platforms that can be utilized to advance its own foreign policy objectives. Such perceptual changes have slowly but significantly led to a greater emphasis on multilateral diplomacy in China’s ASEAN policy. It can be argued that multilateralism now plays a complementary, rather than a supplementary role to bilateralism in the conduct of Chinese foreign policy towards ASEAN in the new era.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 9 |
ID:
023576
|
|
|
|
|
| Publication |
Dec 2002.
|
| Description |
145-169
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 10 |
ID:
023057
|
|
|
|
|
| Publication |
Nov 2002.
|
| Description |
1-33
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 11 |
ID:
067836
|
|
|
| 12 |
ID:
020486
|
|
|
|
|
| Publication |
Nov 2001.
|
| Description |
683-694
|
| Summary/Abstract |
This paper argues that Sino–ASEAN relations, despite reassurances and determination by both sides to increase interactions and cooperation, have some remaining areas of contention and contestation. After its long isolation, self-imposed or otherwise, the PRC has been able to integrate itself successfully into the political life, economies, and security interests of the region. The PRC's market potentials, military capabilities and its enormous size have both excited and threatened the Southeast Asian states. While the Southeast Asian states have been willing to engage this emerging regional power, they are also wary of the potential risks when dealing with it. Increasing trade, investment, and cultural levels between the two regions have made both sides increasingly aware of the opportunities and challenges involved. The relationship is not without problems, although there is a general consensus that it is on a much better footing than in recent decades. The present developments of their relationships and in the next decade are analyzed under three categories: rituals, risks and rivalries.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 13 |
ID:
023572
|
|
|
|
|
| Publication |
2002.
|
| Description |
13-52
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 14 |
ID:
070283
|
|
|
| 15 |
ID:
068521
|
|
|