| Srl | Item |
| 1 |
ID:
105033
|
|
|
| 2 |
ID:
126925
|
|
|
| 3 |
ID:
129221
|
|
|
| 4 |
ID:
114171
|
|
|
|
|
| Publication |
2012.
|
| Summary/Abstract |
American-Iranian relations have always been the most significant variable in Iran's nuclear programme, yet, in the absence of direct diplomatic communication, have never been addressed during multilateral negotiations. Since 1979, misperceptions of each other's intentions and capabilities have prevented Iran and the United States from escaping an ambiguous "cold war" relationship. The decision of the Obama and Ahmadinejad governments to open negotiations in Switzerland in Autumn 2009 marked the first bilateral high-profile meeting between both countries in over thirty years. At this time Iran was dealing with the effects of its June presidential elections, which was Teheran's greatest crisis of legitimacy since the Islamic Revolution. In addition, Iran's power elite was informed by a siege mentality vis-Ã -vis its own people and the international community. Also at this time, the Barack Obama Administration decided to engage Teheran directly. The Iranian government failed to reciprocate American initiatives. The breakdown of talks has, in turn, produced a new United States-sponsored containment doctrine against Iran. Whilst Washington may have shed an exclusive reliance on belligerency, as was the case under President George W. Bush, coercion remains the basis of Iran policy. Within two years after the Obama Administration began experimenting with "two-track" diplomacy, the situation has returned to mutual hostility. The United States and Iran are conducting diplomacy with each other in bad faith.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 5 |
ID:
107582
|
|
|
| 6 |
ID:
165790
|
|
|
| 7 |
ID:
121503
|
|
|
| 8 |
ID:
113163
|
|
|
|
|
| Publication |
2012.
|
| Summary/Abstract |
Power struggles and political fragmentation have been endemic to the Islamic Republic of Iran since its founding in 1979. But although internal division may weaken the state, it is unlikely to break it. The multiple pillars of power in the Iranian republic protect it from sudden collapse. Loyalties can easily shift from one pillar to the next, allowing for the emergence of new political identities. Elections in particular - there have been 28 since the 1979 revolution - are a significant catalyst for such changes.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 9 |
ID:
079756
|
|
|
|
|
| Publication |
London, I B Tauris, 2007.
|
| Description |
xix, 215p.hbk
|
| Standard Number |
9781845113889
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Copies: C:1/I:0,R:0,Q:0
Circulation
| Accession# | Call# | Current Location | Status | Policy | Location |
| 052892 | 955.054/EHT 052892 | Main | On Shelf | General | |
|
|
|
|
| 10 |
ID:
092280
|
|
|
| 11 |
ID:
116429
|
|
|
| 12 |
ID:
112161
|
|
|
| 13 |
ID:
094533
|
|
|
| 14 |
ID:
098891
|
|
|
|
|
| Publication |
2009.
|
| Summary/Abstract |
Dr. Monshipouri is an associate professor of international relations at San Francisco state University. He is the author, most recently, of Muslims in global politics: Identites, interests and human rights.Mr. Assareh is specializing in international law at New York University School of Law.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 15 |
ID:
112112
|
|
|
| 16 |
ID:
094338
|
|
|
| 17 |
ID:
108526
|
|
|
| 18 |
ID:
094268
|
|
|
| 19 |
ID:
102307
|
|
|
|
|
| Publication |
Santa Barbara, Praeger Security International, 2010.
|
| Description |
viii, 281p.
|
| Standard Number |
9780313372230, hbk $ 49.95.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Copies: C:1/I:0,R:0,Q:0
Circulation
| Accession# | Call# | Current Location | Status | Policy | Location |
| 055782 | 320.557/SKE 055782 | Main | On Shelf | General | |
|
|
|
|
| 20 |
ID:
085516
|
|
|
|
|
| Publication |
2009.
|
| Summary/Abstract |
With all the hype surrounding Iran's nuclear program and its incendiary president Ahmadinejad, we have been fooled into believing Tehran is one of our biggest threats. But the country is divided, clerical control is in question and the supreme leader has little influence outside of the state's borders. As Iran faces a presidential election of its own, the country will likely confront s choice between extremism and moderation at the polls.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|