| Srl | Item |
| 1 |
ID:
038198
|
|
|
|
|
| Publication |
London, Frand Cass, 1991.
|
| Description |
190p.
|
| Series |
Cass series: studies in intelligence
|
| Standard Number |
0714633941
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Copies: C:1/I:0,R:0,Q:0
Circulation
| Accession# | Call# | Current Location | Status | Policy | Location |
| 032903 | 353.0089/HAS 032903 | Main | On Shelf | General | |
|
|
|
|
| 2 |
ID:
049069
|
|
|
|
|
| Publication |
London, Frank Cass, 1996.
|
| Description |
228p.
|
| Standard Number |
0714642495
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Copies: C:1/I:0,R:0,Q:0
Circulation
| Accession# | Call# | Current Location | Status | Policy | Location |
| 039046 | 327.12/CHA 039046 | Main | On Shelf | General | |
|
|
|
|
| 3 |
ID:
094080
|
|
|
|
|
| Publication |
2010.
|
| Summary/Abstract |
From their earliest days National Intelligence Estimates (NIEs) have had a special, albeit controversial, place in the study of the United States Intelligence Community's analytical products. In its broadest terms, the debate over the significance of NIEs is marked alternately by the Council on Foreign Relations identification of NIEs as the "most authoritative written judgments concerning national security issues,"1 and by the judgment of a panel headed by former Central Intelligence Agency official Richard Kerr-known as the Kerr Group-which concluded in 2004, after looking at intelligence on Iraq, that "historically, with few exceptions, NIEs have not carried great weight in policy deliberations.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 4 |
ID:
146170
|
|
|
|
|
| Summary/Abstract |
The relationship between the press and the Intelligence Community (IC) in the United States has long been a subject of debate.1 The press alternately has been labeled a collaborator and enabler of U.S. intelligence by previously allowing Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) personnel to pose as journalists and by keeping information about the CIA from the public. It has also been accused of undermining the activities of the IC and endangering U.S. national security by exposing ongoing operations, wrongdoing, scandals, and failures, as well as by publishing secrets. Today, still another relationship is emerging: the press as an independent instrument of oversight.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|