|
|
|
Sort Order |
|
|
|
Items / Page
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Srl | Item |
| 1 |
ID:
142919
|
|
|
|
|
| Summary/Abstract |
China is facing serious energy security issues. In recent years, China's energy structure has undergone major adjustments, while qualitative changes have taken place in the form of energy security. This raises a new question for China's political, diplomatic, military, technological, and industrial structures: How to safeguard China's energy security? This paper is intended to analyze approaches to energy imports and bottlenecks of energy development, and proposes that international cooperation, development of new energy sources and improvement in energy efficiency will contribute to resolving the energy crisis, and puts forward policy proposals to achieve China's strategy of peaceful development.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 2 |
ID:
179486
|
|
|
|
|
| Summary/Abstract |
Since the early days ofthe Cold War, the United States has led
the world in technology. Over the course of the so-called
American century, the country conquered space, spearheaded
the Internet, and brought the world the iPhone. In recent years,
however, China has undertaken an impressive e+ort to claim the
mantle oftechnological leadership, investing hundreds ofbillions of
dollars in robotics, arti-cial intelligence, microelectronics, green energy, and much more.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 3 |
ID:
087612
|
|
|
|
|
| Publication |
2009.
|
| Summary/Abstract |
The idea that the United States is an empire or should adopt imperial strategies has been widely criticized. One of the most persuasive sets of arguments against imperial enthusiasts is that empire is an obsolete and outdated strategy. Both systemic- and domestic-level changes are said to prevent the United States from successfully implementing an imperial strategy. I maintain that the importance of these barriers-whether technological, economic, or ideational-are greatly overstated. In contrast, I point to a number of developments, such as the rise of nontraditional security threats, the revolution in military affairs, and changing norms of humanitarian intervention, that will encourage greater American overseas adventurism.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 4 |
ID:
085924
|
|
|
|
|
| Publication |
2009.
|
| Summary/Abstract |
American primacy in the global disrtribution of capabilities is one of the most salient features of the contemporary international system.The end of the cold war did not return the world to multipolarity.Instead the United States-already materially preeminent-became more so.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|