| Srl | Item |
| 1 |
ID:
096304
|
|
|
| 2 |
ID:
022061
|
|
|
|
|
| Publication |
April-June 2002.
|
| Description |
165-179
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 3 |
ID:
060357
|
|
|
|
|
| Publication |
Nairobi, African Human Security Initiative, 2004.
|
| Description |
x, 91p.
|
| Standard Number |
1919913556
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Copies: C:1/I:0,R:0,Q:0
Circulation
| Accession# | Call# | Current Location | Status | Policy | Location |
| 049452 | 327.1720967/ANI 049452 | Main | On Shelf | General | |
|
|
|
|
| 4 |
ID:
010618
|
|
|
|
|
| Publication |
June 1996.
|
| Description |
71-74
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 5 |
ID:
021501
|
|
|
|
|
| Publication |
May 2002.
|
| Description |
225-228
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 6 |
ID:
019658
|
|
|
|
|
| Publication |
March 2001.
|
| Description |
71-85
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 7 |
ID:
051890
|
|
|
|
|
| Publication |
Jan 2004.
|
| Summary/Abstract |
Examination of the political trajectory of African states since the terminal colonial period suggests that, by the 1990s, the 'post-colonial' label still widely employed was losing its pertinence. The term acquired widespread currency not long after independence in acknowledgment of the importation into new states of the practices, routines and mentalities of the colonial state. These served as a platform for a more ambitious form of political monopoly, whose legitimating discourse was developmentalism. The colonial state legacy decanted into a patrimonial autocracy which decayed into crisis by the 1980s, bringing external and internal pressures for economic and political state reconfiguration. But the serious erosion of the stateness of many African polities by the 1990s limited the scope for effective reform and opened the door for a complex web of novel civil conflicts; there was also a renewed saliency of informal politics, as local societies adapted to diminished state presence and service provision. Perhaps the post-colonial moment has passed.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 8 |
ID:
028002
|
|
|
|
|
| Publication |
London, Pinter Publishers, 1990.
|
| Description |
x, 205p.hbk
|
| Standard Number |
0861878906
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Copies: C:1/I:0,R:0,Q:0
Circulation
| Accession# | Call# | Current Location | Status | Policy | Location |
| 032748 | 960.32/SOM 032748 | Main | On Shelf | General | |
|
|
|
|
| 9 |
ID:
045833
|
|
|
|
|
| Publication |
London, Hodder and Stoughton, 1977.
|
| Description |
vi, 243p.
|
| Standard Number |
034021303
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Copies: C:1/I:0,R:0,Q:0
Circulation
| Accession# | Call# | Current Location | Status | Policy | Location |
| 016895 | 327.6/ALU 016895 | Main | On Shelf | General | |
|
|
|
|
| 10 |
ID:
059975
|
|
|
| 11 |
ID:
101735
|
|
|
|
|
| Publication |
2011.
|
| Summary/Abstract |
Scholars debate whether Eurocentric theories of International Relations (IR) offer useful explanations of African international politics. They also debate the applicability of Eurocentric theories of state making for understanding African state making in the post-colonial era. I argue that theories like realism and war-and-state-making appear inconsistent with African political reality because when IR scholars apply these theories to Africa, they study the wrong actors. The 'right' actors for understanding these theories include not only the official states IR scholars traditionally analyse, but also all of the autonomous political entities that control territory, possess military resources, and struggle to survive under anarchy. I substantiate my claims about the usefulness and necessity of expanding the roster of actors studied with an historical narrative of the first six years of Congo's independence. During this time six autonomous political entities, in addition to the one official state, warred with each other, allied with each other, and struggled to make states.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 12 |
ID:
045835
|
|
|
|
|
| Publication |
New Delhi, John Olatunji Omolodun, 1981.
|
| Description |
xxvi, 163p.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Copies: C:1/I:0,R:0,Q:0
Circulation
| Accession# | Call# | Current Location | Status | Policy | Location |
| 019720 | 327.669/OMO 019720 | Main | On Shelf | General | |
|
|
|
|
| 13 |
ID:
014403
|
|
|
|
|
| Publication |
Jan 1992.
|
| Description |
7-35
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 14 |
ID:
057212
|
|
|
| 15 |
ID:
089134
|
|
|
|
|
| Publication |
2009.
|
| Summary/Abstract |
Recent rhetoric surrounding the contemporary aid relationship between donors and African states is couched in terms of a high-level consensus between western and African political leaderships, a central pillar of which is adherence to liberal principles of governance and economic management. The paper argues that an analysis of the nature of this consensus and its prospects requires that we need to understand it as (1) encompassing specifically international-geopolitical dimensions (including state interests, bargaining and power); and (2) social-developmental purposes and content. The paper uses Rosenberg's considerations on 'international sociology' and uneven and combined development to provide a framework for analysing the aid relationship. In doing this, the paper speaks to two related theoretical issues: conceptualisations of the relationship between the 'social developmental' and the 'geopolitical/international' within International Relations (IR); and the contemporary relevance or otherwise of the discipline of IR to analyses of Africa's place in the international system
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 16 |
ID:
020116
|
|
|
|
|
| Publication |
2001.
|
| Description |
7-16
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 17 |
ID:
020869
|
|
|
|
|
| Publication |
Dec 2001.
|
| Description |
65-89
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 18 |
ID:
014766
|
|
|
|
|
| Publication |
Oct 1992.
|
| Description |
431-450
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|