Query Result Set
Skip Navigation Links
   ActiveUsers:1412Hits:18735487Skip Navigation Links
Show My Basket
Contact Us
IDSA Web Site
Ask Us
Today's News
HelpExpand Help
Advanced search

  Hide Options
Sort Order Items / Page
NUCLEAR EXCHANGE (3) answer(s).
 
SrlItem
1
ID:   129711


Ballistic missile defence: trigger for development of offensive missile technologies / Sethi, Manpreet   Journal Article
Sethi, Manpreet Journal Article
0 Rating(s) & 0 Review(s)
Publication 2011.
        Export Export
2
ID:   115587


Reconsidering the perilous Cuban missile crisis 50 years later / Bernstein, Barton J   Journal Article
Bernstein, Barton J Journal Article
0 Rating(s) & 0 Review(s)
Publication 2012.
        Export Export
3
ID:   086132


Stepping back from the brink: avoiding a nuclear march of folly in South Asia / Davis, Zachary   Journal Article
Davis, Zachary Journal Article
0 Rating(s) & 0 Review(s)
Publication 2009.
Summary/Abstract Historian Barbara Tuchman described the trail of misperceptions and bad decisions that led to mankind's worst self-imposed disasters as a "March of Folly." Now is the time for India and Pakistan to take steps to ensure that another war or crisis between them does not result in a nuclear exchange that destroys both societies. The prospects for rolling back India's or Pakistan's nuclear weapons programs during the Obama administration are zero. Nevertheless, the administration can help reduce the risk of nuclear war in South Asia. There is a growing recognition by New Delhi and Islamabad that a crisis, triggered by events such as the November terrorist attack in Mumbai, could escalate out of control and result in an unintended nuclear exchange. The Kargil crisis in 1999 and the 2002 cross-border attack on the Indian parliament brought the two nuclear rivals to the brink of war. Having survived two Cuban missile crises of their own, it is time India and Pakistan take steps to manage the risks inherent in their tense nuclear relationship.
        Export Export