Srl | Item |
1 |
ID:
099077
|
|
|
2 |
ID:
095158
|
|
|
Publication |
2010.
|
Summary/Abstract |
Today, no one questions that criminals, minors, or those seeking to shirk their civic duties may be restricted or even barred from leaving their respective countries. However, during the 1950s, several democratic countries, including Israel, restricted foreign travel by their citizens on other grounds. This article examines the right of departure policies of Israel in comparison with three models-Soviet, British, and American-which served Israeli policy makers as criteria in this regard. The policy promulgated by a country sheds light on its character, its society, and its perception of citizenship. The article not only describes the right to travel abroad as exercised in Israel, but also opens a window onto the conceptual world of those who set such policy.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3 |
ID:
172736
|
|
|
4 |
ID:
086864
|
|
|
Publication |
2009.
|
Summary/Abstract |
From afar, it looks your typical Staten Island suburban house, but as yor approach the Gonzalez home on Union Avenue, you are suddenly engulfed in the bouncy, polka-like Mexican nortena music coming out of the basement.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5 |
ID:
086150
|
|
|
Publication |
2008.
|
Summary/Abstract |
Why do democratic states try to deceive their own citizens as to the foreign policies they practice, their motives, and their consequences? This question presupposes not only that states craft 'stories' to disguise activities abroad, but that they do so because they are constrained by an audience of non-elite actors. Theories derived from realpolitik, at best, make little allowance for such domestic 'interference'. Yet there is evidence that in democracies the role of mass publics in driving, curbing, or modifying the conduct of foreign policy is a force, and explanatory factor, to reckon with.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|