| Srl | Item |
| 1 |
ID:
188816
|
|
|
|
|
| Summary/Abstract |
A growing literature demonstrates that ideology shapes international relations. But just how does ideology have its effect? This article develops an integrated model of mediators and moderators of the impact of ideology on foreign policy. Specifically, it hypothesizes that ideologically motivated perceptions of threat and national power sequentially mediate the impact of individual-level ideologies on foreign policy preferences, and that in/out-group social categorization processes moderate the relationship. We interrogate these propositions with three plausibility probe case studies. The conclusion discusses which aspects of the model were best supported by the plausibility probes—and suggests hypotheses for future causal testing.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 2 |
ID:
097682
|
|
|
| 3 |
ID:
086638
|
|
|
|
|
| Publication |
2009.
|
| Summary/Abstract |
Because liberal arts colleges are " in certain respects more diverse than any other type of higher education institution, " and because their nature, history, generally shared characteristics, even their very number, are so often a matter of contention, I have learned over the years the wisdom, when attempting to say something about them, of begining with a preliminary exercise in intellectual throat-clearing.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 4 |
ID:
105969
|
|
|
| 5 |
ID:
087984
|
|
|
|
|
| Publication |
2009.
|
| Summary/Abstract |
The unfortunate tale of an intellectual tendency taht, even by its own admission, seems to have gotten everythin wrong
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 6 |
ID:
108464
|
|
|
| 7 |
ID:
136713
|
|
|
|
|
| Summary/Abstract |
Phillips, Joe
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 8 |
ID:
171920
|
|
|
|
|
| Summary/Abstract |
The International Relations (IR) literature has strongly criticised the invasive and top-down nature of liberal peace, facilitating a reinterpretation of the practice of international intervention in conflict-affected societies. Today, sustaining peace policy approaches advance longer-term missions, give a secondary role to external practitioners, and increasingly accept risks and failures. What is striking is that even when these policy discourses hold out the promise of liberating peacebuilding from dominant and top-down models of liberal intervention, the mood in the field is one of despair. By drawing on John Dewey's work on pragmatism and interviewing practitioners in Bosnia and Kosovo, the article reflects on the morass practitioners find themselves, diagnoses the source of the frustrations, and anticipates the direction of sustaining peace. Pragmatism adumbrates the idea of ‘peacebuilding without peace’, encouraging practitioners to experiment, give primacy to their doings and explore this world without hope of success and dreams of otherworldliness.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|