Query Result Set
Skip Navigation Links
   ActiveUsers:1185Hits:19518521Skip Navigation Links
Show My Basket
Contact Us
IDSA Web Site
Ask Us
Today's News
HelpExpand Help
Advanced search

  Hide Options
Sort Order Items / Page
FEDERAL CONSTITUTION (2) answer(s).
 
SrlItem
1
ID:   087187


Beyond the Barisan national: a gramscian perspective of the 2008 Malaysian genreal election / O'Shannassy, Michael   Journal Article
O'Shannassy, Michael Journal Article
0 Rating(s) & 0 Review(s)
Publication 2009.
Summary/Abstract The March 2008 general elections in Malaysia have been characterized as a political "tsunami" with opposition parties enjoying stunning electoral success both at the federal and state levels. In the aftermath of these elections further upheavals in the Malaysian political landscape have taken place. However, is Malaysia witnessing a truly progressive moment, one that is long-term and structural, or is this instead a short-term, regressive, "restorative" moment? More specifically, what do the 2008 elections mean as far as the continuing evolution of Malaysias national identity is concerned? By adopting a Gramsican perspective and drawing upon some of Gramsci's key concepts this article endeavours to offer a more nuanced analysis of the recent elections and their meaning vis-à-vis (re)conceptions of national identity. In the process, this article seeks to explore the development and complex operation of hegemony with particular reference to notions of national identity in contemporary Malaysia.
        Export Export
2
ID:   122488


US presidential elections: two centuries of constitutional continuity and political change-with an analysis of the political geography of Barack Obama's re-election campaign / Dunne, Michael   Journal Article
Dunne, Michael Journal Article
0 Rating(s) & 0 Review(s)
Publication 2013.
Summary/Abstract The system for electing the President of the United States remains essentially as it was prescribed in the Federal Constitution drafted in 1787. The individual 50 states (plus the District of Columbia) are accorded a number of votes in the (so-called) Electoral College; each state's Electoral College vote is then attributed to the candidate gaining a plurality (most) of the popular vote in that state; and the candidate with a majority (50% + 1) of these aggregated Electoral College votes is declared the incoming president. What has changed have been the methods of nominating the candidates, chief of which are the political parties from the nineteenth century with their stage-managed quadrennial conventions and the primary/caucus campaigns from the twentieth century which precede and now determine the formal nomination. President Obama's 2012 re-election campaign showed both the crucial importance of the much-maligned Electoral College in winning the presidency and the demographic divisions hidden in the larger American political landscape.
        Export Export