Query Result Set
Skip Navigation Links
   ActiveUsers:649Hits:26001228Skip Navigation Links
Show My Basket
Contact Us
IDSA Web Site
Ask Us
Today's News
HelpExpand Help
Advanced search

  Hide Options
Sort Order Items / Page
HUMAN RIGHTS TREATY (2) answer(s).
 
SrlItem
1
ID:   087579


Domestic judicial institutions and human rights treaty violatio / Powell, Emilia Justyna; Staton, Jeffrey K   Journal Article
Powell, Emilia Justyna Journal Article
0 Rating(s) & 0 Review(s)
Publication 2009.
Summary/Abstract Democratic and autocratic states routinely violate their international agreements protecting human rights. Scholars typically link ratification and compliance behavior theoretically but test their models separately; however, if the behaviors are jointly determined then we should treat them that way empirically. We consider how domestic judiciaries influence the joint choice to ratify and comply with international human rights regimes. Using data on the ratification status of states under the Convention Against Torture (CAT), states' torture practices, and a series of measures of judicial effectiveness, we examine whether legal institutions are likely to constrain state behavior and by implication raise the costs of ratification.
        Export Export
2
ID:   131897


Towards a regional human rights mechanism in the Asia Pacific: exploring the potential of the Asia Pacific Forum / Croydon, Silvia Atanassova   Journal Article
Croydon, Silvia Atanassova Journal Article
0 Rating(s) & 0 Review(s)
Publication 2014.
Summary/Abstract Stretching a third of the way around the globe, the Asia Pacific is the world's most populous region. Yet, it remains the sole region without a human rights court or commission, and without a human rights treaty. The notable absence there of a human rights mechanism based on such institutions is often explained away by reference to the region's size and heterogeneity, the constituent states' reluctance to interfere in the affairs of others, and the existence of rivalries. Whilst agreeing that there is no inter-governmental initiative that looks set to change the present state of affairs in the Asia Pacific, this article places the spotlight on another model of creating a regional human rights mechanism, that is, the unique and burgeoning Asia Pacific Forum of National Human Rights Institutions. Specifically, it assesses the prospects for Japan, Taiwan and China - three key regional players whose membership of the Forum is still outstanding - to create domestic human rights bodies that eventually join.
        Export Export