|
|
|
Sort Order |
|
|
|
Items / Page
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Srl | Item |
| 1 |
ID:
173710
|
|
|
|
|
| Summary/Abstract |
This paper examines the standoff on the international arena in the information and culture sphere, including ways in which Western countries have developed and employed nonmilitary instruments to achieve foreign policy objectives in historical retrospect and in the present-day conditions. The authors discuss theoretical and methodological basis of devising approaches to the organization and countering of purposeful covert and overt impact on the public in the country, likely methods of improving the system of national counterpropaganda training of civilians, the military political work in the RF Armed Forces, and the natural advantage of their positioning in their cultural-informational standoff with the West.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 2 |
ID:
087659
|
|
|
|
|
| Publication |
2009.
|
| Summary/Abstract |
Information has emerged as a critical-potentially the decisive-front in both the global war with violent radical Islam and the overlapping but so far largely unadmitted Cold War with nonviolent radical Islam. In fact, the information front is undoubtedly the closest thing that al Qaeda has to a strategic center of gravity. Unfortunately, America faces an extremely hostile information environment in the Middle East and al Qaeda has proven far more effective at getting its message across than has the United States. A more effective U.S. information strategy would be one that stresses three themes: a democratic critique of radical Islam; an Islamic critique of radical Islam; and a critique of the crisis in Middle Eastern civilization. While these will not necessarily make the U.S. or its policies more popular, they may drive a wedge between radical Islam and potential supporters.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 3 |
ID:
190548
|
|
|
|
|
| Summary/Abstract |
This paper analyzes problems encountered by RF AF experts in the area of information confrontation on the Internet. It makes conclusions about basic areas of consideration of the identified problems in the interests of enhancing information impact on enemy troops via the Internet.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 4 |
ID:
191039
|
|
|
|
|
| Summary/Abstract |
THE global technological revolution has fundamentally changed human communication capabilities. Since 2005, there has been a transition from Web 1.0 to Web 2.0, from static to dynamic content (not just readable but also editable). Social networks have become the main platforms for interaction among Internet users.
SOCIAL networks serve first of all as platforms for receiving and exchanging information. They are unique in that they have a dual purpose. On the one hand, they are a catalyst for social and interpersonal communication development, as well as an influence tool. On the other hand, they are often used as a tool of information counteraction that changes the balance of power in the international arena and undermines international stability. Studying social media through the lens of threats to national and international security reveals key areas for improving Russian policy to neutralize these threats, as well as prospects for strengthening international cooperation in this area...
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 5 |
ID:
181356
|
|
|
|
|
| Summary/Abstract |
IN THE 21st century, information confrontation is becoming one of the main means of achieving superiority in the geopolitical confrontation between individual states, as well as between various interstate associations, unions, and coalitions. At this new stage of the restructuring of the world order, initiated by powerful interests that include representatives of the world's financial, economic, information, and political elites, Russia has once again found itself at the center of global contradictions, as it has the largest reserves of natural resources, vast territory, and significant environmental, intellectual, strategic military, communication, and other capabilities.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 6 |
ID:
189809
|
|
|
|
|
| Summary/Abstract |
This paper traces changes in the nature and content of military conflicts, offers a prospective model of regime change techniques, lists the main types of military conflicts, describes the innovation of future operations and the space of hostilities, and classifies military conflicts of the future and their basic principles.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|