Query Result Set
Skip Navigation Links
   ActiveUsers:485Hits:19965085Skip Navigation Links
Show My Basket
Contact Us
IDSA Web Site
Ask Us
Today's News
HelpExpand Help
Advanced search

  Hide Options
Sort Order Items / Page
UNEVEN (2) answer(s).
 
SrlItem
1
ID:   087854


Capitalism, uneven and combined development and the transhistor / Ashman, Sam   Journal Article
Ashman, Sam Journal Article
0 Rating(s) & 0 Review(s)
Publication 2009.
Summary/Abstract What is the status of Trotsky's notion of uneven and combined development within Marxist theory and how might it be fruitfully employed by Marxists in international relations? Is uneven and combined development a transhistoric general abstraction or does it need rooting in the relations, processes, tendencies and counter-tendencies of a particular mode of production? This article rejects Justin Rosenberg's recently drawn conclusion that uneven and combined development is usefully understood as a transhistoric general abstraction that potentially offers the basis of a transhistoric theory of the international. Instead it questions the value of transhistoric categories for Marxist theory and pursues the argument that uneven and combined development is best understood within the relations, processes and tendencies of the capitalist mode of production, arguing that capitalist social relations and political forms are historically unique in their capacity to generate both combination and unevenness.
Key Words Capitalism  Uneven  Combined Development  Transhistoric 
        Export Export
2
ID:   186290


Uneven and combined development: a defense of the general abstraction / Rosenberg, Justin   Journal Article
Rosenberg, Justin Journal Article
0 Rating(s) & 0 Review(s)
Summary/Abstract This article responds to criticisms of the current revival of Uneven and Combined Development (UCD), particularly those aimed at the idea of a ‘general abstraction’ of UCD. Three main charges have been pressed: that UCD is not a real theory; that its transhistorical extension has reduced it to an unhistorical reification; and that its language of ‘advanced’ and ‘backward’ betrays its enduring Eurocentric foundations. The article argues not only that UCD can be defended, but also that it is the general abstraction which enables UCD to make its strongest contributions to solving problems of theoretical insufficiency, ahistoricism and Eurocentrism in social thought more generally. Finally the article ends by speculating on the reason why the much-maligned general abstraction of UCD should turn out to be of such significance.
Key Words Uneven  Combined Development  UCD 
        Export Export